Toward Personalized Orthopedic Care: Validation of a Smart Knee Brace

Author:

McPherson Annah,McDaid Andrew J.,Ward Sarah

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Wearable technology offers a promising solution to advance current rehabilitation strategies for post-operative orthopedic care. The aim of this study was to determine the level of agreement and concurrent validity of a smart knee brace compared to the gold standard measurement system GAITRite<sup>®</sup> for assessing lower limb gait parameters. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Thirty-four healthy participants were fitted with the smart knee brace (Digital Knee<sup>®</sup>) on their dominant limb. Gait parameters (stride length, stride time, and gait velocity) were measured simultaneously using the Digital Knee<sup>®</sup> and the GAITRite<sup>®</sup> electronic walkway. Two walks were performed at a comfortable speed and two at a fast-walking speed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> At a comfortable walking speed, stride time was moderately valid (ICC<sub>2,1</sub> = 0.66 s), and stride length and gait velocity demonstrated poor validity (ICC<sub>2,1</sub> = 0.29; ICC<sub>2,1</sub> = 0.41). All gait parameters demonstrated poor validity at a fast-walking speed (ICC<sub>2,1</sub> = −0.16 to −0.01). Bias ranged from −0.08 to 0.28, with more clinically acceptable percentage errors at a comfortable walking speed (14.1–30%) versus at a fast-walking speed (26.4–42.6%). Gait velocity and stride length had substantially higher biases in the fast-walking speed compared to the comfortable walking speed (0.28 ± 0.39 m s<sup>−1</sup> vs. 0.02 ± 0.21 m s<sup>−1</sup>; 0.15 ± 0.23 m vs. −0.04 ± 0.17 m). Limits of agreement were considered narrower for stride time compared to stride length and gait velocity. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The Digital Knee<sup>®</sup> is a promising approach to improving post-operative rehabilitation outcomes in patients with osteoarthritis. The Digital Knee<sup>®</sup> demonstrated good agreement and moderate concurrent validity for measuring gait metrics at a comfortable walking speed. These findings highlight the opportunity of the wearable sensor as an intervention for post-operative orthopedic care. This was a laboratory-based study; thus, further research is required to validate the wearable sensor in real-world contexts and in patients with knee pathologies. Further, refinement of the algorithm for measuring gait metrics at slow- and fast-walking speed with the Digital Knee<sup>®</sup> is warranted.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3