Accuracy of a Novel Transcutaneous PCO<sub>2</sub> and PO<sub>2</sub> Sensor with Optical PO<sub>2</sub> Measurement in Neonatal Intensive Care: A Single-Centre Prospective Clinical Trial

Author:

Baumann PhilippORCID,Gotta VerenaORCID,Adzikah Stephanie,Bernet Vera

Abstract

<b><i>Background and Objectives:</i></b> Transcutaneous PCO<sub>2</sub> and PO<sub>2</sub> measurement systems offer non-invasive blood gas trend monitoring. The aim of this prospective study was to assess bias and precision of a transcutaneous PCO<sub>2</sub> and PO<sub>2</sub> measurement system incorporating a novel pO<sub>2</sub> sensor (Sentec OxiVenT™) in neonates ≥34 weeks of gestational age (GA) admitted to intensive care. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Transcutaneous PCO<sub>2</sub> and PO<sub>2</sub> were compared to arterial and capillary blood gas measurements. Bias and precision were calculated by fitting linear mixed models to account for repeated measurements, and influence of clinical covariates on bias and precision was assessed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We obtained 611 paired transcutaneous and blood gas measurements in 110 patients (median GA 38.3 [interquartile range 36.1–39.7] weeks; age 9 [4–15] days; weight 3,000 [2,500–3,500] g). Transcutaneous PCO<sub>2</sub> showed significant bias to arterial PCO<sub>2</sub> (+0.61; 95% confidence interval 0.46, 0.76 kPa), but not to capillary PCO<sub>2</sub> (−0.23; −0.46, 0.002 kPa). Bias of transcutaneous PO<sub>2</sub> was significant to arterial PO<sub>2</sub> (−2.50; −2.94, −2.06 kPa), while no significant bias compared to capillary PO<sub>2</sub> was observed (+0.17; −0.30, 0.64 kPa). Precision intervals were ±1.8/2.0 kPa for arterial versus capillary PCO<sub>2</sub> and ±4.9/3.3 kPa for arterial versus capillary PO<sub>2</sub> comparisons, respectively. Further, sensor operating temperature (43°C vs. 42°C), soft tissue oedema, vasoactive drugs, weight, and GA significantly altered bias (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The tested transcutaneous blood gas measurement system showed no significant bias compared to capillary PCO<sub>2</sub> and PO<sub>2</sub>, acceptable bias to arterial PCO<sub>2</sub>, and limited agreement with arterial PO<sub>2</sub>. Precision intervals were wide for all comparisons.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

Subject

Developmental Biology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3