Abstract
Introduction: Evidence on the prevalence of uncontrolled asthma upon the standard of care in Japan is scarce and inconsistent. We report the prevalence of uncontrolled asthma using the Japanese Guidelines for Asthma (JGL) 2018 and Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2019 classifications in patients who are currently receiving standard-of-care treatment in a real-life setting. Methods: In this prospective, 12-week, noninterventional study, patients with asthma aged 20–75 years and continuously treated with medium- or high-dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/LABA, with or without other controller(s), were assessed for their asthma control status. The demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, health care resource utilization, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and adherence to prescribed treatments were assessed for patients classified as either controlled or uncontrolled. Results: Of 454 patients, 53.7% and 36.3% of the patients reported their asthma as uncontrolled based on the JGL and GINA criteria, respectively. Uncontrolled asthma was even higher (JGL, 75.0%; GINA, 63.5%) within the subpopulation of 52 patients receiving long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs; i.e., ICS/LABA/LAMA subpopulation). Sensitivity analysis by propensity matching identified significant odds ratios of controlled versus uncontrolled asthma for several demographics and clinical characteristics: male; sensitization to animals, fungi, or birch; comorbidities including food allergy or diabetes; and history of exacerbation were associated with the risk of uncontrolled asthma. No significant changes in PROs were observed. Conclusion: The frequency of uncontrolled asthma in the study population was high, as per JGL and GINA guidelines, despite good adherence to ICS/LABA treatment and other prescribed treatments over 12 weeks.
Subject
Immunology,General Medicine,Immunology and Allergy