Author:
Fu Zhihui,Xie Wanmu,Gao Qian,Zhang Shuai,Zhang Zhu,Zhang Yunxia,Wang Dingyi,Yao Ting,Wang Jinzhi,Li Xincheng,Sun Lu,Huang Qiang,Yang Peiran,Zhai Zhenguo
Abstract
Introduction: Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) is an effective intervention for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease (CTEPD). We aimed to identify the patient group with a low success rate or high complication rate of BPA, which is still unclear. Methods: Both CTEPD patients with or without pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH and NoPH-CTEPD) were included. CTEPH patients were divided into groups with or without pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA-CTEPH and NoPEA-CTEPH). The efficacy and safety of BPA were compared among the groups. Results: There were 450, 66, and 41 sessions in the NoPEA-CTEPH, PEA-CTEPH, and NoPH-CTEPD groups, respectively. The success rate (≥1 degree improvement in flow grade) in the PEA-CTEPH group was 94.5%, significantly lower than that in the NoPEA-CTEPH (97.1%) and NoPH-CTEPD (98.4%) groups (p = 0.014). The percentage of complete flow recovery in treated vessels was also lower in PEA-CTEPH group. BPA-related complication rate in NoPEA-CTEPH, PEA-CTEPH, and NoPH-CTEPD patients was 6.1%, 6.0%, and 0.0%, respectively (p = 0.309). One BPA-related death occurred (solely in NoPEA-CTEPH). Mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥41.5 mm Hg was a predictor of BPA-related complications. NoPEA-CTEPH patients had more improvement in 6-min walk distance (6MWD, 87 ± 93 m NoPEA-CTEPH vs. 40 ± 43 m PEA-CTEPH vs. 18 ± 20 m NoPH-CTEPD, p = 0.012). Conclusions: BPA was safe and effective for all CTEPD groups with less improvement for the PEA-CTEPH and NoPH-CTEPD groups. The success rate of BPA was lower in the PEA-CTEPH group and the complication rate was lower in the NoPH-CTEPD group. Pre-BPA treatment to lower pulmonary artery pressure should not be overlooked in CTEPD patients.