Age-Related Variations in Patterns of Patent Foramen Ovale-Stroke versus Other Cryptogenic Stroke

Author:

Punsalan Monique Therese S.,Jeong Han-YeongORCID,Jung Keun-Hwa,Ha Sue Young,Lee Eung-JoonORCID,Yang Wookjin,Kang Dong-Wan,Kim Jeong-Min,Lee Seung-Hoon

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Patent foramen ovale (PFO)-stroke, a form of cryptogenic stroke, has certain identifying clinical and imaging features. However, data describing this stroke type remain inconsistent. This study examined the potential variations in PFO-stroke features, depending on age. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> From a hospital registry, cryptogenic stroke patients were retrospectively selected, and PFO-strokes were identified by the presence of &gt;10 microembolic signals on transcranial Doppler saline agitation test. Cryptogenic strokes were grouped according to age (&lt;70 as young, ≥70 as elderly). Clinical and imaging variables of PFO-strokes and non-PFO-strokes were compared, with and without age considered. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of the 462 cryptogenic patients, 30.5% (141/462) were PFO-strokes, while majority (321/462) had no PFO. When cryptogenic strokes were analyzed by age, the significant difference was noted in the lesion number, pattern, and side. A single (72.8 vs. 57.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.020) and a small single lesion (51.1 vs. 35.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.039) were frequently seen in the younger PFO-strokes than the non-PFO counterpart, while mixed territory lesions identified the elderly PFO-strokes (30.6 vs. 8.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.001). A multivariate logistic regression analysis of PFO-strokes further showed that age was independently associated with lesion side (OR 1.12 [1.05–1.20], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and lesion number (OR 1.06 [1.02–1.10], <i>p</i> = 0.005). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Incorporating age-specific imaging criteria in the identification of PFO-strokes may be of additional value. Further, PFO may remain contributory to the stroke risk in the elderly, in association with vascular risk factors.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3