The Efficacy and Safety of Chinese Eye Exercise of Acupoints in Dry Eye Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author:

Leedasawat Pavasut,Sangvatanakul Paradi,Tungsukruthai Parunkul,Kamalashiran Chuntida,Phetkate Pratya,Patarajierapun Promporn,Sriyakul Kusuma

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Dry eye disorder (DED) is a growing global issue linked to excessive digital screen time. Chinese eye exercise of acupoint (CEA), a set of self-massages on shared Chinese acupuncture (CA), has been used to reduce visual-related ocular symptoms and possibly as an alternative treatment for DED. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of CEA. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted at Thammasat University Hospital in Thailand, recruiting 56 participants aged 20–60 years, equally divided into two groups: the treatment group with CEA and the control group with standard lid hygiene treatment (STD). The intervention program lasted 12 weeks. Main outcome measures: Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer-I test (SIT), corneal surface staining (CSS), and self-recorded forms for safety and adverse effects were measured at baseline, week 4, and week 12. An independent sample <i>t</i> test, paired <i>t</i> test, and repeated measures (ANOVA) were used to compare results between both groups, study visits, and primary and secondary outcome measurements, respectively. The <i>p</i> values &lt;0.05 were considered statistically significant. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The characteristics were not statistically different between both groups at the baseline. The mean OSDI scores were significantly reduced in both groups at week 4 and week 12 compared to baseline (<i>p</i> value &lt;0.05). Additionally, both CEA and STD showed significant improvement in TBUT and SIT (<i>p</i> value &lt;0.05). CSS was significantly improved only in the CEA groups (<i>p</i> value &lt;0.05). No significant differences were observed between the study groups, except for SIT at week 12 (<i>p</i> value &lt;0.05). For the safety, there were no adverse side effects in either group. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> CEA seemed to be as effective as STD in improving the OSDI, TBUT, and SIT of DED without causing any side effects.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3