Oral Examination versus Simulation-Based Assessment in Assessing Patient Care Competencies for Emergency Medicine Residents

Author:

Bamadhaf WailORCID

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Assessment is essential for any accreditation process in the medical field. If a candidate passes a high-stakes assessment, they can work independently. While oral examinations are common, given the complexity of clinical competencies, such an approach may not be the most effective assessment method. A form of performance-based assessment, such as a simulation, may be beneficial in this context. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> This study aims to determine whether the results of oral examinations match those of simulation-based assessments when both modalities are used to evaluate residents’ performance in scenarios featuring similar content. It also seeks to determine whether oral examinations under- or overestimate residents’ competencies concerning patient care when compared to their simulation performance. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This is a cross-sectional, single-centre study. Emergency medicine residents underwent an oral examination and completed a simulation-based assessment. Standardized scenarios were used to assess the residents’ emergency medicine competencies. A global rating scale was used to rate participants’ performance in each assessment modality. <b><i>Results:</i></b> There was a moderate positive correlation between oral examination and simulation-based assessment results (<i>r</i> = 0.699, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05, <i>n</i> = 28). A paired <i>t</i> test indicates that the oral examination overestimates residents’ competency compared to the simulation-based assessment; the mean difference is 0.26 (confidence interval: 0.041–0.493). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Emergency medicine residents whose knowledge was assessed at the “know-how” level of Miller’s pyramid in the oral examination were not necessarily able to move up to the level of “show-how” by demonstrating the ability to apply their knowledge in the simulation-based assessment. The findings of this study confirm that simulation-based assessments should be an essential aspect of high-stakes examinations intended to determine residents’ different clinical competencies.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

Subject

General Medicine

Reference8 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3