Evaluation of Axial Length Measurement Using Enhanced Retina Visualization Mode of the Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer in Dense Cataract

Author:

Tamaoki Akeno,Kojima TakashiORCID,Hasegawa Asato,Yamamoto Mana,Kaga Tatsushi,Tanaka Kiyoshi,Ichikawa Kazuo

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> It has been reported that even using the swept-source (SS) optical coherence biometer, it is challenging to measure the axial length (AL) in cases with advanced cataracts. The enhanced retina visualization (ERV) mode, which is equipped with OCTB1 (ARGOS), shifts the peak of measurement sensitivity to the retinal side so that the AL can be measured even if the light energy is attenuated. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy and efficacy of the ERV mode in measuring the AL of dense cataracts. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This was a single-center retrospective observational case series conducted in Japan. We included 213 eyes of 213 consecutive patients with advanced cataracts who underwent preoperative evaluation. The AL was measured before and after surgery using two SS optical coherence tomography biometers (OCTB1 and OCTB2; IOLMaster 700). Cases in which OCTB1 the standard mode failed to measure AL, OCTB1 with the ERV mode was used instead. Primary outcome measures were the acquisition rate and the AL measurement accuracy using the ERV mode. The χ<sup>2</sup> test, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to compare the acquisition rate and differences between pre- and postoperative AL values, respectively. In the ERV subgroup, Bland-Altman plots were used to compare the pre- and postoperative AL values measured using OCTB1-ERV mode. A <i>p</i>-value of less than 5% was considered statistically significant. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The AL acquisition rate was not significantly different between OCTB1 with the standard mode and OCTB2. The AL of 65 eyes (30.5%) could not be measured using OCTB1 with the standard mode. Conversely, the AL of 51 of these eyes (78.5%) was successfully measured using OCTB1 with the ERV mode. In these 51 eyes, a difference of ≤0.2 mm and of ≤0.1 mm between pre- and postoperative AL measurements was observed in 40 (78.4%) and 30 eyes (58.8%), respectively. The Bland-Altman plot found no systematic error between pre- and postoperative AL values measured using the ERV mode. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> In patients with dense cataracts, AL measurement using the standard mode of an SS-OCT biometer is challenging. Furthermore, the ERV mode could be promising for AL measurement in such cases.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

Subject

Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience,Sensory Systems,Ophthalmology,General Medicine

Reference21 articles.

1. Kershner RM. Refractive cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1998 Feb;9(1):46–54.

2. Olsen T. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1992 Mar;18(2):125–9.

3. Olsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007 Aug;85(5):472–85.

4. Norrby S. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Mar;34(3):368–76.

5. Findl O, Kriechbaum K, Sacu S, Kiss B, Polak K, Nepp J, et al. Influence of operator experience on the performance of ultrasound biometry compared to optical biometry before cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Oct;29(10):1950–5.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3