Comparison of Two Different Ultrasound Systems for the Evaluation of Tissue Doppler Velocities in Fetuses

Author:

Cruz-Lemini MónicaORCID,Valenzuela-Alcaraz Brenda,Figueras Francesc,Sitges Marta,Gómez Olga,Martínez Josep María,Bijnens Bart,Gratacós Eduard,Crispi Fátima

Abstract

Introduction: Recent studies have reported variations of up to 30% between different ultrasound machines for tissue Doppler imaging (TDI), a problem that can significantly impact clinical diagnosis, patient management and research studies. The objective of this study was to assess repeatability and agreement between fetal myocardial peak velocities evaluated by TDI with two different ultrasound systems. Materials and Methods: Systolic (S'), early (E') and late (A') diastolic myocardial peak velocities at mitral and tricuspid annuli as well as at the basal septum were evaluated by spectral TDI in 150 fetuses using two different ultrasound systems: Siemens Antares (Siemens Medical Systems, Malvern, Pa., USA) and Vivid Q (General Electric Healthcare, Horten, Norway). A method comparison study was performed, calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and agreement was assessed by Bland-Altman plots. Results: Annular peak velocities showed lower values when measured by Vivid Q compared to values measured by Siemens Antares. ICC ranged from 0.07 (septal S') to 0.33 (right A'), showing very poor repeatability for clinical application. Agreement between the two systems was also poor, with high coefficients of variation for all measurements. Conclusions: Fetal annular peak velocities obtained with different ultrasound systems are not directly comparable. This is consistent with previous data in adults and warrants the need of system-specific reference values, suggesting that the same ultrasound machine should be used for longitudinal follow-up.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynaecology,Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Embryology,General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3