Author:
Zhao Youshen,Dohi Osamu,Ishida Tsugitaka,Yoshida Naohisa,Ochiai Tomoko,Mukai Hiroki,Seya Mayuko,Yamauchi Katsuma,Miyazaki Hajime,Fukui Hayato,Yasuda Takeshi,Iwai Naoto,Inoue Ken,Itoh Yoshito,Liu Xinkai,Zhang Ruiyao,Zhu Xin
Abstract
<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Esophagogastroduodenoscopy is the most important tool to detect gastric cancer (GC). In this study, we developed a computer-aided detection (CADe) system to detect GC with white light imaging (WLI) and linked color imaging (LCI) modes and aimed to compare the performance of CADe with that of endoscopists. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The system was developed based on the deep learning framework from 9,021 images in 385 patients between 2017 and 2020. A total of 116 LCI and WLI videos from 110 patients between 2017 and 2023 were used to evaluate per-case sensitivity and per-frame specificity. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The per-case sensitivity and per-frame specificity of CADe with a confidence level of 0.5 in detecting GC were 78.6% and 93.4% for WLI and 94.0% and 93.3% for LCI, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The per-case sensitivities of nonexpert endoscopists for WLI and LCI were 45.8% and 80.4%, whereas those of expert endoscopists were 66.7% and 90.6%, respectively. Regarding detectability between CADe and endoscopists, the per-case sensitivities for WLI and LCI were 78.6% and 94.0% in CADe, respectively, which were significantly higher than those for LCI in experts (90.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.004) and those for WLI and LCI in nonexperts (45.8% and 80.4%, respectively, <i>p</i> < 0.001); however, no significant difference for WLI was observed between CADe and experts (<i>p</i> = 0.134). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Our CADe system showed significantly better sensitivity in detecting GC when used in LCI compared with WLI mode. Moreover, the sensitivity of CADe using LCI is significantly higher than those of expert endoscopists using LCI to detect GC.