Association between Apolipoprotein E Polymorphism and Clinical Outcome after Ischemic Stroke, Intracerebral Hemorrhage, and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Abstract

Backgrounds: Previous studies reported inconsistent results regarding associations between apolipoprotein E (APOE) polymorphism and clinical outcomes after ischemic stroke (IS), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Thus, the study was designed to make a systematic review and meta-analysis regarding the association between APOE polymorphism and clinical outcome after IS, ICH, and SAH. Methods: To identify studies eligible for this meta-analysis, we searched for articles published before August 2021 in the databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar). We used STATA 12.0 software to compute hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) regarding APOE polymorphism and clinical outcome after IS, ICH, and SAH. Results: Meta-analysis showed no significant association between APOE polymorphism and functional outcome after IS with fixed effects models (ε4 carrier vs. non-ε4 carrier: HR, 1.00; 95% CI: 0.83–1.21, I2 = 29.4%, p = 0.183; ε2 carrier vs. non-ε2 carrier: HR, 0.92; 95% CI: 0.72–1.16, I2 = 15.6%, p = 0.307). Meta-analysis showed that ICH patients carrying ε4 allele have increased risk of poor outcome in Caucasian population with fixed effects models (ε4 carrier vs. non-ε4 carrier: HR, 1.75; 95% CI: 1.19–2.57, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.543). Meta-analysis showed no significant association between APOE polymorphism and functional outcomes after SAH with random effects models (ε4 carrier vs. non-ε4 carrier: HR, 1.51; 95% CI: 0.80–2.84, I2 = 57.1%, p = 0.022). Conclusions: In conclusion, the present study demonstrated APOE ε4 carriers show worse functional outcomes after ICH, but not after IS or SAH. More large-scale studies were critical to explore the association between APOE polymorphism and clinical outcome after IS, ICH, and SAH.