Efficacy of Intragastric Balloon versus Liraglutide as Bridge to Surgery in Super-Obese Patients

Author:

Martines Gennaro,Dezi Agnese,Giove Carlo,Lantone Valerio,Rotelli Maria Tersa,Picciariello Arcangelo,Tomasicchio GiovanniORCID

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Bariatric surgery is a safe and effective treatment for obesity, although in super-obese patients (BMI ≥50 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) it can become challenging for anatomical and anesthesiologic issues. Several bridging therapies have been proposed to increase preoperative weight loss and decrease perioperative morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of different two-stage approaches in super-obese patients: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) following preoperative liraglutide therapy versus LSG with preoperative intragastric balloon (IGB) during a 1-year follow-up. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Clinical records of 86 patients affected by super-obesity who underwent two-stage approach between January 2019 and January 2022 were retrospectively reviewed using a prospectively maintained database. Patients were separated into two groups: those managed with preoperative IGB and those with liraglutide 3.0 mg prior to LSG. Weight (kg), BMI (kg/m<sup>2</sup>), %EWL, and %EBWL were reported and compared between the two groups at the end of bridging therapy, at 6th month and 12th month postoperatively. Postoperative complications were recorded. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Forty-four patients underwent IGB insertion prior to LSG, while 42 were treated with liraglutide. There were no statistical differences in baseline weight and BMI. At the end of preoperative treatment, the group treated with IGB reported a significant reduction in BMI (47.24 kg/m<sup>2</sup> vs. 53.6 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; <i>p &lt;</i> 0.391) compared to liraglutide group. There were no differences recorded between the two groups concerning postoperative complications. At 6 months, the liraglutide group had lower %EWL (15.8 vs. 29.84; <i>p &lt; 0.05</i>) and %EBWL (27.8 vs. 55.6; <i>p &lt; 0.05</i>) when compared to IGB group. At 12 months, the IGB preserved with higher %EWL (39.9 vs. 25; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) and %EBWL (71.2 vs. 42; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> A two-stage therapeutic approach with IGB prior to LSG in super-obese patients could be considered an attractive alternative to liraglutide as bridging therapy before bariatric surgery.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

Subject

Physiology (medical),Health (social science)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3