Sex-Based Differences in the Outcomes of Intracerebral Haemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Yang Liting,Han Jian,Qin Chenghui,Shou Weiqing

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The aim of the study was to provide updated evidence on the sex-based differences in the risk of mortality and functional outcomes in subjects with intracerebral haemorrhage. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A systematic search of eligible studies was conducted using three large databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus for observational studies that documented the comparative risk of mortality and functional outcomes based on the subjects’ sex. Only studies published in the year 2000 and onwards were included. Random-effects model was used to pool relevant data, and effect sizes were reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). <b><i>Results:</i></b> The review included 32 studies. In most of the studies, female subjects had a higher mean age compared to males and had a higher rate of neurological deficits at admission. A higher proportion of males had cardiovascular risk factors. The risk of mortality at hospital discharge (OR 0.98, 95% CI: 0.90, 1.06), 1-month (OR 0.98, 95% CI: 0.81, 1.18), 3-month (OR 1.13, 95% CI: 0.95, 1.33), and 12-month (OR 1.04, 95% CI: 0.90, 1.19) follow-up was similar in both sexes. Compared to females, males had a lower risk of poor functional outcomes at 3-month (OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.77, 0.89) and 12-month (OR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.77, 0.98) follow-up. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> There is a similar risk of mortality but better functional outcomes in males with intracerebral haemorrhage compared to females. However, the findings should be interpreted cautiously as there were significant sex-based differences in risk profiles at admission. Further studies that focus on careful and meticulous examination of sex-specific association with survival and functional outcomes are needed.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical),Neurology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3