Does the Side Matter? A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Left and Right Pure Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomies

Author:

Zeuschner PhilipORCID,Stöckle Michael,Peters Robert,Miller Kurt,Liefeldt Lutz,Halleck Fabian,Budde Klemens,Hennig Linda,Friedersdorff Frank

Abstract

<b><i>Objectives:</i></b> Right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (RLDN) is no longer regarded inferior to left LDN (LLDN). However, this knowledge is based on many studies suffering from inherent learning curves, center-specific imbalances, and different laparoscopic techniques. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Pure LDNs at a high-volume referral center from 2011 to 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient, graft characteristics, outcomes of LDNs, and corresponding open kidney transplantations were compared between LLDN and RLDN including a follow-up. <b><i>Results:</i></b> 160 (78.4%) LLDNs and 44 (21.6%) RLDNs only differed regarding graft characteristics, as more right grafts had multiple veins (34.1 vs. 6.9%, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) and worse scintigraphic function (44 vs. 51%, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). RLDNs were shorter (201 vs. 220 min, <i>p</i> = 0.032) with longer warm ischemia time (165 vs. 140 s, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001), but left grafts were transplanted faster (160 vs. 171 min, <i>p</i> = 0.048). Recipients of right kidneys had more postoperative complications (grade 3: 25.6 vs. 11.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.020). At a follow-up of 45 (range 6–79) months, neither the kidney function, nor death-censored graft (5-year: LLDN 89 vs. 92%, <i>p</i> = 0.969) and patient survival (5-year: LLDN 95 vs. 98%, <i>p</i> = 0.747) differed. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Pure LLDN and RLDN can have different outcomes at high-volume centers, especially higher complications for recipients of right grafts. However, long-term function and graft survival are the same irrespective of the chosen side.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

Subject

Urology

Reference23 articles.

1. Broudeur L, Karam G, Chelghaf I, De Vergie S, Rigaud J, Perrouin Verbe MA, et al. Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy in case of right kidney and multiple-renal artery kidney: a systematic review of the literature. World J Urol. 2020;38(4):919–27.

2. Buell JF, Edye M, Johnson M, Li C, Koffron A, Cho E, et al. Are concerns over right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy unwarranted? Ann Surg. 2001;233(5):645–51.

3. Abrahams HM, Meng MV, Freise CE, Stoller ML. Pure laparoscopic right donor nephrectomy: step-by-step approach. J Endourol. 2004;18(3):221–5.

4. Turk IA, Giessing M, Deger S, Davis JW, Fabrizio MD, Schönberger B, et al. Laparoscopic live donor right nephrectomy: a new technique with preservation of vascular length. Transplant Proc. 2003;35(2):838–40.

5. Keller JE, Dolce CJ, Griffin D, Heniford BT, Kercher KW. Maximizing the donor pool: use of right kidneys and kidneys with multiple arteries for live donor transplantation. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(10):2327–31.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3