Development of the BioCalculus Assessment (BCA)

Author:

Taylor Robin T.1,Bishop Pamela R.2,Lenhart Suzanne3,Gross Louis J.4,Sturner Kelly5

Affiliation:

1. RTRES Consulting, Knoxville, TN 37934

2. National Institute for STEM Evaluation and Research (NISER), National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis (NIMBioS), University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996

3. National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis (NIMBioS), Department of Mathematics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996

4. National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis (NIMBioS), Departments of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Mathematics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996

5. National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis (NIMBioS), University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996

Abstract

We describe the development and initial validity assessment of the 20-item BioCalculus Assessment (BCA), with the objective of comparing undergraduate life science students’ understanding of calculus concepts in different courses with alternative emphases (with and without focus on biological applications). The development process of the BCA included obtaining input from a large network of scientists and educators as well as students in calculus and biocalculus courses to accumulate evidential support of the instrument’s content validity and response processes of test takers. We used the Rasch model to examine the internal structure of scores from students who have experienced calculus instruction in the two methods. The analysis involved three populations (Calculus 1, Calculus 2, and Biocalculus) for which the Calc 1 and Calc 2 students were not exposed to calculus concepts in a life science setting, while the Biocalculus students were presented concepts explicitly with a life science emphasis. Overall, our findings indicate that the BCA has reasonable validity properties, providing a diagnostic tool to assess the relative learning success and calculus comprehension of undergraduate biology majors from alternative methods of instruction that do or do not emphasize life science examples.

Publisher

American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB)

Subject

General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Education

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Pre-service biology teachers’ perception on project-based transdisciplinary assessment in calculus course;THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE EDUCATION (ICoMSE) 2021: Science and Mathematics Education Research: Current Challenges and Opportunities;2023

2. How students reason about matter flows and accumulations in complex biological phenomena: An emerging learning progression for mass balance;Journal of Research in Science Teaching;2022-07

3. Assessing quantitative modelling practices, metamodelling, and capability confidence of biology undergraduate students;International Journal of Science Education;2021-05-23

4. Changing the Nature of Quantitative Biology Education: Data Science as a Driver;Bulletin of Mathematical Biology;2020-09-19

5. Mathematical Biology Education: Changes, Communities, Connections, and Challenges;Bulletin of Mathematical Biology;2020-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3