Comparative analysis of reagent kits for DNA extraction from dry blood stains

Author:

Sedykh A. V.1,Saitgalina M. A.1,Ostankova Yu. V.1,Totolian A. A.2

Affiliation:

1. Saint Petersburg Pasteur Institute

2. Saint Petersburg Pasteur Institute; First St. Petersburg State I. Pavlov Medical University

Abstract

Neonatal screening is a mandatory newborn screening procedure that detects the presence of genetic diseases. Dry blood stains are used for mass screening of children. This technology is the most affordable and convenient for the transportation and storage of biological material. DNA extraction is one   of the important steps in molecular diagnostics, the accuracy of which is particularly important in genetic analysis. Different DNA extraction kits offer different protocols and reagents, which may vary in efficiency and quality of extraction.The aim of our work was to perform a comparative analysis of reagent kits for DNA extraction from dried blood spots.The materials were dried blood drop samples on Guthrie cards obtained from healthy preterm infants on day 3-4 of life as part of a newborn screening program.The study methods included spectrophotometric analysis to determine the concentration and purity of DNA, the simplicity of protocols, the duration of isolation, and the possibility of automating the process were also evaluated. The efficiency of DNA isolation using different reagent kits was additionally monitored by real-time PCR results using a test system to assess the level of TREC and KREC in peripheral blood, since quantitative analysis requires more attention to the material under study.In assessing the purity of the nucleic acid extracted using four kits analyzed, successful deproteinization of DNA samples and relative purity could be observed. The average DNA purity for the “Extra-DNA-Bio” set was 2.2±0.23, for “EXTRA-prep PS” – 1.89±0.23, for “MagnoPrime UNI” with manual and automatic isolation – 2.31±0.21 and 2.85±0.09, respectively. The average DNA concentration for the Extra-DNA-Bio kit was 15.28 μg/mL, for the EXTRA-Prep PS kit it was 16.26 μg/mL, and for the MagnoPrime UNI for manual and automated isolation it was 62.5 μg/mL and 102.28 μg/mL, respectively. According to the applied Kraskell-Wallis criterion and Dunn’s test, significant differences in both TREC and KREC parameters are present between the group of DNA samples extracted using the “MagnoPrime UNI” reagent kit for manual extraction and the groups of samples extracted by other methods (“MagnoPrime UNI” for automatic extraction) or “Extra-DNA-Bio” and “EXTRA-Prep PS” kits.In the course of the present study, four comparable reagent sets demonstrated a high level of convergence of the obtained data, satisfying all the necessary parameters for further molecular genetic analysis, can be used for neonatal screening and in other areas of research requiring DNA extraction from a dried blood spots.

Publisher

SPb RAACI

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3