Drug hypersensitivity: Mechanisms and opportunities of laboratory diagnostics
-
Published:2022-04-20
Issue:2
Volume:24
Page:235-246
-
ISSN:2313-741X
-
Container-title:Medical Immunology (Russia)
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Med. immunol.
Affiliation:
1. A. Nikiforov Russian Centre of Emergency and Radiation Medicine;
First St. Petersburg State I. Pavlov Medical University
Abstract
Permanently increased frequency of drug hypersensitivity is observed throughout the world and continues to be of concern to clinicians of either discipline. Diagnostic problems with prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity reactions are due to different pathogenetic mechanisms that may underly similar clinical manifestations. On the other hand, clinical symptoms, response to therapy and the outcome of the disease significantly depend on clinical state of the patient. The phenotypes which are determined by clinical manifestations, and endotypes dependent on the pathogenetic mechanisms of hypersensitivity reactions were specified to the purpose of personalized therapy. Two kinds of phenotypes are described: with immediate (1-6 hours) and delayed (more than 6 hours) onset of the response. Four types of hypersensitivity according to Gell and Coombs with the presence of primary sensitization are discerned between the endotypes. Moreover, interaction of drugs with immune receptors of lymphocytes, according to the Pichler’s pharmaco-immune concept, has been identified, along with quick impact of drugs directly upon receptors of effector cells and signaling cascades without primary sensitization, which was previously termed as “pseudo-allergy”. To optimize therapy and prevent repeated reactions in the patients with drug hypersensitivity, high-quality diagnostics with detection of the causal allergen is required. This strategy currently includes analysis of medical history, physical examination as well as in vivo and in vitro testing. Provocation tests are rarely used, due to the significant risk of severe adverse reactions. Skin tests are a reliable and cost-effective tool, if the case history infers possibility of IgE-dependent reactions. Among nonspecific laboratory markers, the greatest clinical value is shown for determining serum tryptase levels, especially in anaphylactic reactions. In addition to genetic testing, several specific laboratory methods are used, i.e., measuring levels of drug-specific IgE, assessment of antigen-induced activation and proliferation of lymphocytes as well as basophil activation test, which has a number of advantages and allows us to identify a causally significant allergen for the hypersensitivity reactions proceeding by various mechanisms. Due to dysregulation which is a key factor of allergic inflammation, the mechanisms of normalization for impaired immune regulation should be understood, thus offering new strategies for personalized treatment, e.c., modulating the regulatory cell functions, aiming for control of the drug hypersensitivity reactions.
Subject
Immunology,Immunology and Allergy
Reference70 articles.
1. Bychkova N.V. Basophil activation: theoretical aspects and use in the diagnosis of allergic diseases. Meditsinskaya immunologiya = Medical Immunology (Russia), 2021, Vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 481-494. (In Russ.) doi: 10.15789/1563-0625-BAT-2174. 2. Simbirtsev A.S. Cytokines and their role in immune pathogenesis of allergy. Rossiyskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal “Meditsinskoe obozrenie” = Russian Medical Inquiry, 2021, Vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 32-37. (In Russ.) 3. Federal clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of drug allergy. Clinical guidelines. Allergology and clinical immunology. Ed. Khaitov R.M., Ilyina N.I.] Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2019, pp. 190-213. 4. Aberer W., Bircher A., Romano A., Blanca M., Campi P., Fernandez J., Brockow K., Pichler W.J., Demoly P.; European Network for Drug Allergy (ENDA); EAACI interest group on drug hypersensitivity. Drug provocation testing in the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions: general considerations. Allergy, 2003, Vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 854-863. 5. Ansotegui I.J., Melioli G., Canonica G.W., Caraballo L., Villa E., Ebisawa M., Passalacqua G., Savi E., Ebo D., Gómez R.M., Luengo Sánchez O., Oppenheimer J.J., Jensen-Jarolim E., Fischer D.A., Haahtela T., Antila M., Bousquet J.J., Cardona V., Chiang W.C., Demoly P.M., DuBuske L.M., Ferrer Puga M., Gerth van Wijk R., González Díaz S.N., Gonzalez-Estrada A., Jares E., Kalpaklioğlu A.F., Kase Tanno L., Kowalski M.L., Ledford D.K., Monge Ortega O.P., Morais Almeida M., Pfaar O., Poulsen L.K., Pawankar R., Renz H.E., Romano A.G., Rosário Filho N.A., Rosenwasser L., Sánchez Borges M.A., Scala E., Senna G.E., Sisul J.C., Tang M.L.K., Thong B.Y., Valenta R., Wood R.A., Zuberbier T. IgE allergy diagnostics and other relevant tests in allergy, a World Allergy Organization position paper. World Allergy Organ J., 2020, Vol. 13, no. 2, 100080. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2019.100080.
|
|