Methodological approaches to assessing the digitalisation of public administration and public services

Author:

Mikhulya Denis Yu.ORCID

Abstract

Subject. Digitalisation is a global trend in the evolution and transformation of public administration systems. The developed methodological approaches, which allow assessing the effectiveness of this process and determining its impact on the socio-economic dynamics of states, strive to catch up with the rapid development of modern information and communication technologies. What is more, the government often acts as a driving force for the introduction of these technologies. The existing international, national, and regional methods of assessment are based on criteria and indicators which depend on the analytical purposes. Such criteria are developed within different databases and focus on different aspects of the digitalisation of public administration. It is important to analyse and monitor the outcomes and conditions of digital processes in public administration as well as the demand for them. Such analysis and motoring contribute to information management required for the implementation of other state functions.Objectives. The research is aimed at achieving the following research objectives: to analyse the state of the existing system of assessment of digitalisation in the area of public administration with due account of current assessment trends, to determine the advantages and disadvantages of the existing methods, to develop an original approach to their classification, and to search for optimisation opportunities. Methodology. The dialectical method and the methods of analysis and synthesis were used to achieve these objectives. The study is based on the contemporary achievements in the methods for assessing the digitalisation of public administration described in relevant research papers and regulations.Conclusions. The peculiarities of existing methods for assessing the digitalisation of public administration are due to both the peculiarities of the analysed object and the needs of the users of the analytical information. In this regard, we propose an original classification of assessment approaches, which consists of the following groups of methods: methods that assess the digitalisation conditions (group 1), the results of digitalisation in terms of available public services (group 2) and in terms of satisfaction of the main stakeholders: the public, businesses, state bodies, government agencies, and their employees (group 3). As a way of optimisation, it was considered whether it would be relevant to include indicators of the use of artificial intelligence technologies in public administration.

Publisher

Voronezh State University

Reference20 articles.

1. Abramov, V. I., & Andreev, V. D. (2023). Analysis of the digital transformation strategy of Russian regions in the context of achieving national goals. Public Administration Issues, (1), 89-119. (In Russian).

2. Dobrolyubova, E. I., Yuzhakov, V. N., & Starostina, A. N. (2021). Digital transformation of public administration: assessment of effectiveness and efficiency. Moscow, Delo Publ. (In Russian).

3. Index “Digital Russia” (2018). Moscow, Skolkovo. (In Russian).

4. Kuzina, L. S. (2023). Who and why does not use the Internet in Russia? Digital Economy, (274). (In Russian).

5. Kuznetsova, I. V. (2021). Methods for assessing the effectiveness of the use of digital technologies in the public administration system. New Technologies, (2), 93-100. (In Russian).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3