The Decision to Breastfeed in the United States: Does Race Matter?

Author:

Forste Renata1,Weiss Jessica1,Lippincott Emily1

Affiliation:

1. 1From the Department of Sociology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.

Abstract

Objectives. To estimate the effects of maternal and birth characteristics on the decision to breastfeed and to relate breastfeeding practices to racial differences in infant mortality. Methods. Using a sample of women with young children from the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), Cycle V, 1995, the likelihood of breastfeeding was modeled using logistic regression techniques. In addition, single, live births from the NSFG 1988 and 1995 surveys were analyzed to model the effects of race and breastfeeding on infant mortality using Cox regression methods. Results. After controlling for socioeconomic background and birth characteristics, race remained a strong predictor of breastfeeding. Black women were less likely to breastfeed than nonblack women were, and the primary reason indicated by black women for not breastfeeding was that they “preferred to bottle-feed.” Analyses of infant mortality indicated that breastfeeding accounts for the race difference in infant mortality in the United States at least as well as low birth weight does. Conclusions. Race is an important predictor of breastfeeding, with most black women reporting that they “preferred bottle-feeding.” Efforts to increase breastfeeding of infants in the black community should help narrow the racial gap in infant mortality.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Reference30 articles.

1. “Breast is best”: modern meanings.;Jelliffe;N Engl J Med,1977

2. Is it worthwhile breast-feeding?;Forsyth;Eur J Clin Nutr,1992

3. How breast milk protects newborns.;Newman;Sci Am,1995

4. Breast-feeding incidence and duration in black and white women.;Kurinij;Pediatrics,1988

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3