A Randomized Comparison of Home Visits and Hospital-Based Group Follow-Up Visits After Early Postpartum Discharge

Author:

Escobar Gabriel J.12,Braveman Paula A.3,Ackerson Lynn1,Odouli Roxana1,Coleman-Phox Kim1,Capra Angela M.1,Wong Carlene4,Lieu Tracy A.5

Affiliation:

1. From Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program Perinatal Research Unit Division of Research, Oakland, California;

2. Kaiser Permanente Medical Center Department of Pediatrics, Walnut Creek, California;

3. Department of Family and Community Medicine University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California;

4. Kaiser Permanente Medical Center Department of Pediatrics, Santa Clara, California; and

5. Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention Harvard Pilgrim Health Care and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Abstract

Objective. Short postpartum stays are common. Current guidelines provide scant guidance on how routine follow-up of newly discharged mother–infant pairs should be performed. We aimed to compare 2 short-term (within 72 hours of discharge) follow-up strategies for low-risk mother–infant pairs with postpartum length of stay (LOS) of <48 hours: home visits by a nurse and hospital-based follow-up anchored in group visits. Methods. We used a randomized clinical trial design with intention-to-treat analysis in an integrated managed care setting that serves a largely middle class population. Mother–infant pairs that met LOS and risk criteria were randomized to the control arm (hospital-based follow-up) or to the intervention arm (home nurse visit). Clinical utilization and costs were studied using computerized databases and chart review. Breastfeeding continuation, maternal depressive symptoms, and maternal satisfaction were assessed by means of telephone interviews at 2 weeks postpartum. Results. During a 17-month period in 1998 to 1999, we enrolled and randomized 1014 mother–infant pairs (506 to the control group and 508 to the intervention group). There were no significant differences between the study groups with respect to maternal age, race, education, household income, parity, previous breastfeeding experience, early initiation of prenatal care, or postpartum LOS. There were no differences with respect to neonatal LOS or Apgar scores. In the control group, 264 mother–infant pairs had an individual visit only, 157 had a group visit only, 64 had both a group and an individual visit, 4 had a home health and a hospital-based follow-up, 13 had no follow-up within 72 hours, and 4 were lost to follow-up. With respect to outcomes within 2 weeks after discharge, there were no significant differences in newborn or maternal hospitalizations or urgent care visits, breastfeeding discontinuation, maternal depressive symptoms, or a combined clinical outcome measure indicating whether a mother–infant pair had any of the above outcomes. However, mothers in the home visit group were more likely than those in the control group to rate multiple aspects of their care as excellent or very good. These included the preventive advice delivered (76% vs 59%) and the skills and abilities of the provider (84% vs 73%). Mothers in the home visit group also gave higher ratings on overall satisfaction with the newborn's posthospital care (71% vs 59%), as well as with their own posthospital care (63% vs 55%). The estimated cost of a postpartum home visit to the mother and the newborn was $265. In contrast, the cost of the hospital-based group visit was $22 per mother–infant pair; the cost of an individual 15-minute visit with a registered nurse was $52; the cost of a 15-minute individual pediatrician visit was $92; and the cost of a 10-minute visit with an obstetrician was $92. Conclusions. For low-risk mothers and newborns in an integrated managed care organization, home visits compared with hospital-based follow-up and group visits were more costly but achieved comparable clinical outcomes and were associated with higher maternal satisfaction. Neither strategy is associated with significantly greater success at increasing continuation of breastfeeding. This study had limited power to identify group differences in rehospitalization and may not be generalizable to higher-risk populations without comparable access to integrated hospital and outpatient care.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Reference46 articles.

1. Summary of workshop: early discharge and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia.;Catz;Pediatrics,1995

2. Early discharge from the newborn nursery—effect on scheduling of follow-up visits by pediatricians.;Maisels;Pediatrics,1997

3. Follow-up of newborns and their mothers after early hospital discharge.;Egerter;Clin Perinatol,1998

Cited by 109 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Define the Outcome (Worksheet D);Intervention Effectiveness Research: Quality Improvement and Program Evaluation in Healthcare;2024

2. Delivery Strategies for Postpartum Care;Obstetrics & Gynecology;2023-09

3. Effect of Counseling Service on Breastfeeding Practice among Saudi Mothers;Healthcare;2023-03-17

4. The effect of hospital-based breastfeeding group education given early perinatal period on breastfeeding self-efficacy and breastfeeding status;Journal of Neonatal Nursing;2023-02

5. Early postpartum discharge before 48 h: An exhaustive review;Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction;2022-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3