Validation of a Parent-Reported Experience Measure of Integrated Care

Author:

Ziniel Sonja I.12345,Rosenberg Hannah N.67,Bach Ashley M.6,Singer Sara J.8910,Antonelli Richard C.367

Affiliation:

1. Center for Patient Safety and Quality Research, Program for Patient Safety and Quality,

2. Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine,

3. Departments of Pediatrics and

4. Pediatric Hospital Medicine, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado;

5. Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado;

6. Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Medicine, and

7. Integrated Care Program, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts;

8. Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts;

9. Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; and

10. Mongan Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to design and validate a survey measuring the parents’ and caregivers’ experiences of integration of their child’s care across providers. METHODS: After review of the literature on care coordination and integration, we solicited input regarding care experiences from focus groups of families with children with chronic conditions. These data informed a 95-item pilot survey that included elements from a care integration measure designed for adult care experiences. The survey was then administered to parents of children who had had at least 1 primary care appointment and 2 specialty care appointments in the previous 12 months. Psychometric analyses were used to establish scales through exploratory factor analysis, internal consistency using Cronbach’s α, test–retest reliability using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, and known-group validity according to χ2 tests. All research activities were institutional review board approved. RESULTS: The pilot survey was completed as either a Web or mail survey by 255 participants. After excluding nonrating or screening questions and items not applicable to a large percentage of participants, 26 experience items were included in the exploratory factor analysis. The final survey contained 19 experience items in 5 scales: access, communication, family impact, care goal creation, and team functioning. Psychometric analyses supported these 5 scales. CONCLUSIONS: This project developed and validated a survey with 19 experience items, plus additional demographic and health needs and usage items. The Pediatric Integrated Care Survey can be used in quality improvement efforts to measure family-reported experience of pediatric care integration.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference26 articles.

1. Patient- and family-centered care coordination: a framework for integrating care for children and youth across multiple systems.;Council on Children with Disabilities and Medical Home Implementation Project Advisory Committee;Pediatrics,2014

2. US Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau . The National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs Chartbook 2005–2006. 2008. Available at: http://mchb.hrsa.gov/cshcn05. Accessed March 8, 2016

3. Antonelli RC, McAllister JW, Popp J. Making care coordination a critical component of the pediatric health system: a multidisciplinary framework. The Commonwealth Fund. Available at: www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2009/may/making-care-coordination-a-critical-component-of-the-pediatric-health-system. Accessed March 8, 2016

4. Defining and measuring integrated patient care: promoting the next frontier in health care delivery.;Singer;Med Care Res Rev,2011

5. The family-centered medical home: specific considerations for child health research and policy.;Stille;Acad Pediatr,2010

Cited by 54 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3