Justified by What? Three Ways to Provide an Ethical Basis for Neonatal Policies

Author:

Ursin Lars1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; and St Olav’s University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway

Abstract

In this article, I identify 3 ways of justifying neonatal policies of when to provide life-saving treatment to infants who were born extremely premature: by appealing to universal principles or rights, to considerations of the best interests of the children, or to considerations of the best interests of the families. I go on to show how each of these justifications can be used to characterize the discourse on neonatal policies in 1 of the Scandinavian countries.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Reference7 articles.

1. The Swedish approach to management of extreme prematurity at the borderline of viability – a historical and ethical perspective.;Domellöf;Pediatrics,2018

2. Don’t rush it: conservative care in Denmark;Greisen;Pediatrics,2018

3. NICU dialects: understanding Norwegian practice variation.;Syltern;Pediatrics,2018

4. United Nations. Convention on the Rights of the Child: adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 44/25 of 20 November 1989 entry into force 2 September 1990, in accordance with article 49. 1990. Available at: www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CRC.aspx. Accessed April 26, 2018

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3