Author:
Dinakar Chitra,Chipps Bradley E.,Matsui Elizabeth C.,Abramson Stuart L.,Dinakar Chitra,Irani Anne-Marie,Kim Jennifer S.,Mahr Todd A.,Pistiner Michael,Wang Julie,Katkin Julie P.,Van Hook Kristin N.,Brooks Lee J.,Hudak Bonnie B.,Kravitz Richard M.,Paranjape Shrutim,Schechter Michael S.,Sharma Girish D.,Stokes Dennis C., ,
Abstract
Asthma affects an estimated 7 million children and causes significant health care and disease burden. The most recent iteration of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute asthma guidelines, the Expert Panel Report 3, emphasizes the assessment and monitoring of asthma control in the management of asthma. Asthma control refers to the degree to which the manifestations of asthma are minimized by therapeutic interventions and the goals of therapy are met. Although assessment of asthma severity is used to guide initiation of therapy, monitoring of asthma control helps determine whether therapy should be maintained or adjusted. The nuances of estimation of asthma control include understanding concepts of current impairment and future risk and incorporating their measurement into clinical practice. Impairment is assessed on the basis of frequency and intensity of symptoms, variations in lung function, and limitations of daily activities. “Risk” refers to the likelihood of exacerbations, progressive loss of lung function, or adverse effects from medications. Currently available ambulatory tools to measure asthma control range are subjective measures, such as patient-reported composite asthma control score instruments or objective measures of lung function, airway hyperreactivity, and biomarkers. Because asthma control exhibits short- and long-term variability, health care providers need to be vigilant regarding the fluctuations in the factors that can create discordance between subjective and objective assessment of asthma control. Familiarity with the properties, application, and relative value of these measures will enable health care providers to choose the optimal set of measures that will adhere to national standards of care and ensure delivery of high-quality care customized to their patients.
Publisher
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
Subject
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference50 articles.
1. Expert Panel Report 3 (EPR-3). Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma—summary report 2007.;National Asthma Education and Prevention Program;J Allergy Clin Immunol,2007
2. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention, Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2015 Update. 2015. Available at: www.ginasthma.org. Accessed June 14, 2016
3. The burden of asthma in the United States: level and distribution are dependent on interpretation of the national asthma education and prevention program guidelines.;Fuhlbrigge;Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2002
4. The status of asthma control and asthma prescribing practices in the United States: results of a large prospective asthma control survey of primary care practices.;Carlton;J Asthma,2005
5. Monitoring asthma in childhood: symptoms, exacerbations and quality of life.;Brand;Eur Respir Rev,2015
Cited by
66 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献