Challenging the Current Recommendations for Carrier Testing in Children

Author:

VanNoy Grace E.1,Genetti Casie A.1,McGuire Amy L.2,Green Robert C.345,Beggs Alan H.16,Holm Ingrid A.16,

Affiliation:

1. Division of Genetics and Genomics and The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts;

2. Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas;

3. Departments of Medicine and

4. Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and

5. The Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts

6. Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts;

Abstract

The authors of current professional guidelines generally do not support the return of information about genetic carrier status for infants and children because of a perceived lack of immediate benefit and an abundance of caution regarding potential harm and desire to protect the children’s future autonomy. The advent of genomic sequencing, used either as a diagnostic or a screening tool, and the increasing use of this technology in childhood creates the potential for the identification of carrier status in the pediatric period. As part of the BabySeq Project, researchers are exploring the implications of genomic sequencing in both newborns who are healthy and newborns who are sick and developing policies and procedures for the return of carrier status information to the parents and physicians of newborns. In this commentary, we review the history of carrier testing in children and explore the potential benefits, risks, and challenges of returning such results both for the children, their parents, and potential future siblings.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Reference18 articles.

1. Technical report: ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children [published correction appears in Genet Med. 2013;15(4):321].;Ross;Genet Med,2013

2. Points to consider: ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents [published correction appears in Am J Hum Genet. 2015;97(3):501].;Botkin;Am J Hum Genet,2015

3. Elroy M; American Association for the Advancement of Science. Researchers and policymakers point to successes and challenges in personalized medicine. 2009. Available at: https://www.aaas.org/news/researchers-and-policymakers-point-successes-and-challenges-personalized-medicine. Accessed December 14, 2017

4. Kennedy S; BiteSize Bio. Newborn screening. Saving lives the molecular way. 2007. Available at: http://bitesizebio.com/articles/newborn-screening-saving-lives-the-molecular-way/. Accessed December 14, 2017

5. Vergano D. Baby gene map could cut diagnosis to days. USA Today. October 3, 2012. Available at: www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/10/03/neonatal-genome-sequencing-speedadvances/1610163/. Accessed December 14, 2017

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3