Pediatricians’ Experiences With and Perceptions of the Vaccines for Children Program

Author:

O’Leary Sean T.12,Allison Mandy A.12,Vogt Tara3,Hurley Laura P.14,Crane Lori A.15,Brtnikova Michaela12,McBurney Erin1,Beaty Brenda L.1,Crawford Nathan3,Lindley Megan C.3,Stokley Shannon K.3,Kempe Allison12

Affiliation:

1. Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, School of Medicine, University of Colorado and Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado;

2. Department of Pediatrics and

3. National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; and

4. Division of General Internal Medicine, Denver Health, Denver, Colorado

5. Department of Community and Behavioral Health, School of Public Health and

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Vaccines for Children Program (VFC) provides vaccines for children who may not otherwise be vaccinated because of financial barriers. Pediatrician participation is crucial to the VFC’s ongoing success. Our objectives were to assess, among a national sample of pediatricians, (1) VFC program participation, (2) perceived burden versus benefit of participation, and (3) knowledge and perception of a time-limited increased payment for VFC vaccine administration under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. METHODS: An electronic and mail survey was conducted from June 2017 to September 2017. RESULTS: Response rate was 79% (372 of 471); 86% of pediatricians reported currently participating in the VFC; among those, 85% reported never having considered stopping, 10% considered it but not seriously, and 5% seriously considered it. Among those who had considered no longer participating (n = 47), the most commonly reported reasons included difficulty meeting VFC record-keeping requirements (74%), concern about action by the VFC for noncompliance (61%), and unpredictable VFC vaccine supplies (59%). Participating pediatricians rated, on a scale from −5 (high burden) to +5 (high benefit), their overall perception of the VFC: 63% reported +4 or +5, 23% reported +1 to +3, 5% reported 0, and 9% reported −1 to −5. Of pediatricians, 39% reported awareness of temporary increased payment for VFC vaccine administration. Among those, 10% reported that their practice increased the proportion of Medicaid and/or VFC-eligible patients served on the basis of this change. CONCLUSIONS: For most pediatricians, perceived benefits of VFC participation far outweigh perceived burdens. To ensure the program’s ongoing success, it will be important to monitor factors influencing provider participation.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference27 articles.

1. Vaccines for Children Program, United States, 1997;Santoli,1999

2. Sustained efficacy up to 4.5 years of a bivalent L1 virus-like particle vaccine against human papillomavirus types 16 and 18: follow-up from a randomised control trial;Harper;Lancet,2006

3. Financing the delivery of vaccines to children and adolescents: challenges to the current system;Lindley;Pediatrics,2009

4. Benefits from immunization during the Vaccines for Children Program era - United States, 1994-2013;Whitney;MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep,2014

5. Reduction of racial/ethnic disparities in vaccination coverage, 1995-2011;Walker;MMWR Suppl,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3