Lessons Learned From Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Defects

Author:

Oster Matthew E.12,Aucott Susan W.3,Glidewell Jill1,Hackell Jesse4,Kochilas Lazaros2,Martin Gerard R.5,Phillippi Julia6,Pinto Nelangi M.7,Saarinen Annamarie8,Sontag Marci9,Kemper Alex R.10

Affiliation:

1. National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia;

2. Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia;

3. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland;

4. Pomona Pediatrics PC, Pomona, New York;

5. Children’s National Health System, Washington, District of Columbia;

6. Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, Tennessee;

7. Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah;

8. Newborn Foundation|Newborn Coalition, Saint Paul, MN;

9. Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado; and

10. Duke Clinical Research Institute and Department of Pediatrics, Durham, North Carolina

Abstract

Newborn screening for critical congenital heart defects (CCHD) was added to the US Recommended Uniform Screening Panel in 2011. Within 4 years, 46 states and the District of Columbia had adopted it into their newborn screening program, leading to CCHD screening being nearly universal in the United States. This rapid adoption occurred while there were still questions about the effectiveness of the recommended screening protocol and barriers to follow-up for infants with a positive screen. In response, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention partnered with the American Academy of Pediatrics to convene an expert panel between January and September 2015 representing a broad array of primary care, neonatology, pediatric cardiology, nursing, midwifery, public health, and advocacy communities. The panel’s goal was to review current practices in newborn screening for CCHD and to identify opportunities for improvement. In this article, we describe the experience of CCHD screening in the United States with regard to: (1) identifying the target lesions for CCHD screening; (2) optimizing the algorithm for screening; (3) determining state-level challenges to implementation and surveillance of CCHD; (4) educating all stakeholders; (5) performing screening using the proper equipment and in a cost-effective manner; and (6) implementing screening in special settings such as the NICU, out-of-hospital settings, and areas of high altitude.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cited by 74 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3