Author:
Ralston Steven J.,Leuthner Steven R., ,
Abstract
The past 2 decades have yielded profound advances in the fields of prenatal diagnosis and fetal intervention. Although fetal interventions are driven by a beneficence-based motivation to improve fetal and neonatal outcomes, advancement in fetal therapies raises ethical issues surrounding maternal autonomy and decision-making, concepts of innovation versus research, and organizational aspects within institutions in the development of fetal care centers. To safeguard the interests of both the pregnant woman and the fetus, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Academy of Pediatrics make recommendations regarding informed consent, the role of research subject advocates and other independent advocates, the availability of support services, the multidisciplinary nature of fetal intervention teams, the oversight of centers, and the need to accumulate maternal and fetal outcome data.
Publisher
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
Subject
Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
Reference18 articles.
1. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 439: informed consent;American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Committee on Ethics;Obstet Gynecol,2009
2. Risk and the pregnant body;Lyerly;Hastings Cent Rep,2009
3. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 377: research involving women;American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Committee on Ethics;Obstet Gynecol,2007
4. The moral significance of birth;Warren,1992
5. Maternal autonomy: ethics and the law;Sullivan;Int J Obstet Anesth,2006
Cited by
70 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献