Relative Efficacy of Amethocaine Gel and Lidocaine–Prilocaine Cream for Port-a-Cath Puncture in Children

Author:

Bishai Raafat1,Taddio Anna23,Bar-Oz Benjamin1,Freedman Melvin H.45,Koren Gideon135

Affiliation:

1. From the Departments of Paediatrics,

2. Pharmacy, and

3. Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario; and the CIBC Wood Gundy Children's Miracle Foundation Chair in Child Health Research (G.K.).

4. Hematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children; and the Faculties of

5. Medicine and

Abstract

Background. Lidocaine–prilocaine cream (EMLA) is currently standard therapy to alleviate procedural pain in children. One of the disadvantages of lidocaine–prilocaine is the need to wait for 60 minutes for adequate skin anesthesia. Amethocaine gel (Ametop) is a new topical anesthetic that requires a shorter application time for skin anesthesia. Objectives. To compare the relative efficacy and safety of amethocaine gel and lidocaine–prilocaine cream in children with cancer undergoing Port-a-Cath puncture and to determine which patient factors influence judgments about pain. Methods. Randomized, blinded, crossover study. Each child received either 1 g of amethocaine gel for 30 minutes, preceded by a placebo gel for 30 minutes, or 1 g of lidocaine–prilocaine cream for 60 minutes. Children rated the pain using the faces scale, for which scores ranged from 0 to 5. Parents and attending nurse operators rated pain on a 10-cm visual analog scale. Results. Thirty-nine children participated. The mean age was 10.2 years (range: 5–16 years), and 69% were male. There were no differences in mean pain assessments between amethocaine and lidocaine–prilocaine as rated by the children (2.0 vs 0.5), parents (2.6 vs 6.4), or nurse operators (2.0 vs 0.9). No serious adverse effects were detected with either preparation. Pain scores assigned by parents and children were not influenced by age, gender, duration of diagnosis, or anesthetic regimen (amethocaine versus lidocaine–prilocaine) in the child. Nurses, however, rated pain higher for younger children, and in males during pretreatment with lidocaine–prilocaine. Conclusion. Amethocaine achieves similar anesthesia to lidocaine–prilocaine during Port-a-Cath administration in children, with an application time that is half of lidocaine–prilocaine. Pain assessments were not influenced by age, gender, or duration of diagnosis of the child. Nurses may perceive that pain is greater for younger children and in males. lidocaine–prilocaine, amethocaine, pain, children, Port-a-Cath puncture.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3