Research Methods: How to Perform an Effective Peer Review-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Research Methods: How to Perform an Effective Peer Review

Published:2022-10-10 Issue:11 Volume:12 Page:e409-e413
ISSN:2154-1663
Container-title:Hospital Pediatrics
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Lu Elise Peterson¹²,Fischer Brett G.³,Plesac Melissa A.⁴,Olson Andrew P.J.⁴⁵

Affiliation:

1. aPaul C. Gaffney Division of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

2. bDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

3. cWeill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York

4. dDepartment of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minneapolis

5. eDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minneapolis

Abstract

Scientific peer review has existed for centuries and is a cornerstone of the scientific publication process. Because the number of scientific publications has rapidly increased over the past decades, so has the number of peer reviews and peer reviewers. In this paper, drawing on the relevant medical literature and our collective experience as peer reviewers, we provide a user guide to the peer review process, including discussion of the purpose and limitations of peer review, the qualities of a good peer reviewer, and a step-by-step process of how to conduct an effective peer review.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics,General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Link

https://publications.aap.org/hospitalpediatrics/article-pdf/12/11/e409/1389434/hpeds.2022-006764.pdf

Reference20 articles.

1. Peer review in scientific publications: benefits, critiques, & a survival guide;Kelly;EJIFCC,2014

2. Everything you need to know about peer review - the good, the bad and the ugly;Gregory;Heart Lung Circ,2019

3. Medical journal peer review: process and bias;Manchikanti;Pain Physician,2015

4. The limitations to our understanding of peer review;Tennant;Res Integr Peer Rev,2020

5. Journal editors’ perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study;Glonti;BMJ Open,2019

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. How to Peer Review for Scientific Journals?;International Journal of Advanced Medical and Health Research;2024-01

2. Peer review as a science evaluation tool: main tensions and some alternative proposals;e-Ciencias de la Información;2023-12-11

3. The Ongoing Importance of Peer Review;Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association;2023-10-19

4. Identifying Reputable and Non-Reputable Journal Articles Using Machine Learning;Applied Research Approaches to Technology, Healthcare, and Business;2023-09-29

5. Club bibliográfico de la Sociedad Española de Radiología Médica: Historia, análisis y perspectivas tras 10 años de trayectoria;Radiología;2023-07