“To Call or Not to Call” Communication Preferences Among Pediatric Hospital Medicine Team Leaders

Author:

O’Hara Kimberly1,Tseng Ashlie2,Herbst Lori34,Moss Stephanie5,Marsicek Sarah6,Herbst Brian37,Molas-Torreblanca Kira8,Maniscalco Jennifer9,Ziniel Sonja I.1

Affiliation:

1. aDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado

2. bDepartment of Pediatrics, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia

3. cDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Hospital Medicine, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio

4. dDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Division of Palliative Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio

5. eDepartment of Hospital Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Community Care, Department of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, Pediatrics Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

6. fDepartment of Pediatrics, AdventHealth for Children, Orlando, Florida

7. gDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio

8. hDepartment of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Division of Hospital Medicine, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California

9. iDepartment of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University, Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital, Office of Medical Education, St. Petersburg, Florida

Abstract

OBJECTIVES Pediatric Hospital Medicine fellowship programs need to abide by Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements regarding communication and supervision. Effective communication is critical for safe patient care, yet no prior research has explored optimal communication practices between residents, fellows, and attending hospitalists. Our objective is to explore communication preferences among pediatric senior residents (SRs), Pediatric Hospital Medicine fellows, and hospitalists on an inpatient team during clinical decision-making. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional survey study at 6 institutions nationwide. We developed 3 complementary surveys adapted from prior research, 1 for each population: 200 hospitalists, 20 fellows, and 380 SRs. The instruments included questions about communication preferences between the SR, fellow, and hospitalist during clinical scenarios. We calculated univariate descriptive statistics and examined paired differences in percent agreement using χ2 tests, accounting for clustering by institution. RESULTS Response rates were: 53% hospitalists; 100% fellows; 39% SRs. Communication preferences varied based on role, scenario, and time of day. For most situations, hospitalists preferred more communication with the fellow overnight and when a patient or family is upset than expressed by fellows (P < .01). Hospitalists also desired more communication between the SR and fellow for an upset patient or family than SRs (P < .01), but all respondents agreed the SR should call the fellow for adverse events. More fellows and hospitalists felt that the SR should contact the fellow before placing a consult compared with SRs (95%, 86% vs 64%). CONCLUSIONS Hospitalists, fellows, and SRs may have differing preferences regarding communication, impacting supervision, autonomy, and patient safety. Training programs should consider such perspectives when creating expectations and communication guidelines.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics,General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference39 articles.

1. American Board of Medical Specialties. ABMS officially recognizes pediatric hospital medicine subspecialty. Available at: https://www.abms.org/news-events/abms-officially-recognizes-pediatric-hospital-medicine-subspecialty-certification/. Accessed April 21, 2020

2. The current state of PHM fellowships;Shah;J Hosp Med,2016

3. Improving patient safety through provider communication strategy enhancements;Dingley,2008

4. Using incident reports to assess communication failures and patient outcomes;Umberfield;Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3