Identifying Acute Neuropsychiatric Events in Children and Adolescents

Author:

Antoon James W.12,Feinstein James A.34,Grijalva Carlos G.5,Zhu Yuwei6,Dickinson Emily34,Stassun Justine C.12,Johnson Jakobi A.12,Sekmen Mert12,Tanguturi Yasas C.7,Gay James C.8,Williams Derek J.12

Affiliation:

1. aDivision of Hospital Medicine, Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee

2. bDepartment of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee

3. cAdult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado

4. dUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado

5. eDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Health Policy

6. fDepartment of Biostatistics

7. gDivision of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry

8. hDivision of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee

Abstract

OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to develop and validate an approach to accurately identify incident pediatric neuropsychiatric events (NPEs) requiring hospitalization by using administrative data. METHODS We performed a cross-sectional, multicenter study of children 5 to 18 years of age hospitalized at two US children’s hospitals with an NPE. We developed and evaluated 3 NPE identification algorithms: (1) primary or secondary NPE International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision diagnosis alone, (2) NPE diagnosis, the NPE was present on admission, and the primary diagnosis was not malignancy- or surgery-related, and (3) identical to algorithm 2 but without requiring the NPE be present on admission. The positive predictive value (PPV) of each algorithm was calculated overall and by diagnosis field (primary or secondary), clinical significance, and NPE subtype. RESULTS There were 1098 NPE hospitalizations included in the study. A total of 857 confirmed NPEs were identified for algorithm 1, yielding a PPV of 0.78 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76–0.80). Algorithm 2 (n = 846) had an overall PPV of 0.89 (95% CI 0.87–0.91). For algorithm 3 (n = 938), the overall PPV was 0.86 (95% CI 0.83–0.88). PPVs varied by diagnosis order, NPE clinical significance, and subtype. The PPV for critical clinical significance was 0.99 (0.97–0.99) for all 3 algorithms. CONCLUSIONS We identified a highly accurate method to identify neuropsychiatric adverse events in children and adolescents. The use of these approaches will improve the rigor of future studies of NPE, including the necessary evaluations of medication adverse events, infections, and chronic conditions.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics,General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3