Accuracy of Using a Point-of-Care Glucometer for Cerebrospinal Fluid Glucose Screening in Resource-Limited Countries

Author:

Kitsommart Ratchada1,Wongsinin Thananjit12,Swasee Uraporn1,Paes Bosco3

Affiliation:

1. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand;

2. Department of Pediatrics, Bhumibol Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand; and

3. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore the accuracy of using a point-of-care (POC) glucometer for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) glucose screening. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted. A glucose analysis of CSF samples collected from infants <90 days with suspected meningitis was paired between tests by using a POC glucometer (POC-CSF glucose) and a laboratory glucose analysis (laboratory-CSF glucose). Accuracy and limits of agreement were compared, as well as the glucometer performance to detect a laboratory-CSF glucose level <45 and 60 mg/dL. RESULTS: Seventy-three CSF samples were analyzed. Subjects’ mean gestational age was 32.2 (SD 4.0) weeks, the mean weight was 1947.7 (SD 814.5) g, and the median age was 8 (interquartile range: 2 to 19.5) days. POC-CSF glucose levels ranged from 26 to 126 mg/dL. The mean (±1.96 SD) difference between POC-CSF and laboratory-CSF glucose levels was −1.6 (interquartile range: −12.6 to 9.4) mg/dL. A POC-CSF glucose level <45 mg/dL has a sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) to detect a laboratory-CSF glucose level <45 mg/dL of 82% and 94%, respectively. For a laboratory-CSF glucose level <60 mg/dL, a POC glucose level <60 mg/dL provides a sensitivity and NPV of 96% and 90%, respectively, whereas sensitivity and NPV reach 100% at a POC glucose level <70 mg/dL. CONCLUSIONS: A POC glucometer for CSF glucose can detect a potential abnormal glucose level with an appropriate cutoff level. This may facilitate rapid decisions for empirical antibiotics in suspected meningitis, pending laboratory results in limited-resource settings, but requires robust validation in future studies before implementation.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics,General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3