Quantifying Electronic Health Record Data: A Potential Risk for Cognitive Overload

Author:

Gal Dana B.12,Han Brian12,Longhurst Chistopher3,Scheinker David24,Shin Andrew Y.12

Affiliation:

1. Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine and

2. Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford, Palo Alto, California; and

3. Departments of Biomedical Informatics and Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California

4. School of Engineering, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To quantify and describe patient-generated health data. METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-center study of patients hospitalized in the pediatric cardiovascular ICU between February 1, 2020, and February 15, 2020. The number of data points generated over a 24-hour period per patient was collected from the electronic health record. Data were analyzed by type, and frontline provider exposure to data was extrapolated on the basis of patient-to-provider ratios. RESULTS: Thirty patients were eligible for inclusion. Nineteen were hospitalized after cardiac surgery, whereas 11 were medical patients. Patients generated an average of 1460 (SD 509) new data points daily, resulting in frontline providers being presented with an average of 4380 data points during a day shift (7:00 am to 7:00 pm). Overnight, because of a higher patient-to-provider ratio, frontline providers were exposed to an average of 16 060 data points. There was no difference in data generation between medical and surgical patients. Structured data accounted for >80% of the new data generated. CONCLUSIONS: Health care providers face significant generation of new data daily through the contemporary electronic health record, likely contributing to cognitive burden and putting them at risk for cognitive overload. This study represents the first attempt to quantify this volume in the pediatric setting. Most data generated are structured and amenable to data-optimization systems to mitigate the potential for cognitive overload and its deleterious effects on patient safety and health care provider well-being.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics,General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Reference23 articles.

1. The Obama EHR experiment;Grams;J Med Syst,2012

2. What it will take to achieve the as-yet-unfulfilled promises of health information technology;Kellermann;Health Aff (Millwood),2013

3. Gawande A . Why doctors hate their computers. The New Yorker. November 12, 2018. Available at: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/11/12/why-doctors-hate-their-computers. Accessed May 19, 2020

4. The clinician’s perspective on electronic health records and how they can affect patient care;Walsh;BMJ,2004

5. Electronic health record usability issues and potential contribution to patient harm;Howe;JAMA,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3