A Survey of Perceived Effectiveness of Part 4 Maintenance of Certification

Author:

Tieder Joel S.12,Prall Sean P.3,Beck Jimmy12,Alberda Erin1,Jensen Debra1,Nair Deepthi1,Carline Jan D.3

Affiliation:

1. Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington; and

2. Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Pediatrics and

3. Division of Medical Education and Evaluation, Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Evaluative assessment is needed to inform improvement of Part 4 Maintenance of Certification (MOC), a large-scale program that aims to improve physician knowledge, engagement, and skills in quality improvement (QI). We sought to determine if Part 4 MOC participation improves perceived educational and clinical outcomes by piloting a new physician survey. METHODS: We administered a new online survey (MOC Practice, Engagement, Attitude, and Knowledge Survey) to physicians at the beginning and end of a Part 4 MOC project sponsored by a pediatric hospital’s American Board of Medical Specialties’ portfolio program during 2015. Participants worked in academic and community settings and in various accredited specialties. The main outcome was change in survey response on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = best) for 3 learning domains (QI engagement and attitude; QI method application, and improved patient care). RESULTS: Of 123 complete responses and a 97% response rate, mean baseline responses were positive or neutral (2.2, 2.3, 1.9, respectively). Responses improved in QI engagement and attitude (−0.15, z score = −2.78, P = .005), QI method application (−0.39, z score = −7.364, P < .005), and improved patient care (−0.11, z score = −1.728, P = .084). CONCLUSIONS: A Part 4 MOC physician survey provides valuable data to evaluate and improve the learning activity. In this children’s hospital program, physicians view Part 4 favorably. Participation was associated with modest improvements in perceptions of QI engagement and attitude, application of QI methods, and patient care. Systematic evaluation of all Part 4 MOC projects and programs has the potential to improve the program nationally.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics,General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference22 articles.

1. American Board of Medical Specialties. Standards for the ABMS Program for Maintenance Certification (MOC). 2014. Available at: www.abms.org/media/1109/standards-for-the-abms-program-for-moc-final.pdf. Accessed September 13, 2016

2. Getting maintenance of certification to work: a grounded theory study of physicians’ perceptions;Cook;JAMA Intern Med,2015

3. American Board of Internal Medicine. ABIM announces immediate changed to MOC program. 2015. Available at: www.abim.org/news/abim-announces-immediate-changes-to-moc-program.aspx. Accessed September 13, 2016

4. American Board of Medical Specialties maintenance of certification: theory and evidence regarding the current framework;Hawkins;J Contin Educ Health Prof,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3