A Practical Guide to Writing and Reviewing Abstracts for Pediatric Academic Meetings-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A Practical Guide to Writing and Reviewing Abstracts for Pediatric Academic Meetings

Published:2016-06-01 Issue:6 Volume:6 Page:369-373
ISSN:2154-1663
Container-title:Hospital Pediatrics
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Glick Alexander F.¹,Szilagyi Peter G.²,Freed Gary L.³,Hanson Janice L.⁴,Dreyer Benard P.¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatrics, New York University School of Medicine/Bellevue Hospital Center, New York, New York;

2. Mattel Children’s Hospital, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California;

3. Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Unit, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and

4. Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics,General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Link

https://publications.aap.org/hospitalpediatrics/article-pdf/6/6/369/813885/hpeds_2015-0247.pdf

Reference21 articles.

1. Improving participation and interrater agreement in scoring Ambulatory Pediatric Association abstracts. How well have we succeeded?;Kemper;Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med,1996

2. Interrater reliability in grading abstracts for the Orthopaedic Trauma Association;Bhandari;Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research,2004

3. Reviewer agreement trends from four years of electronic submissions of conference abstract;Rowe;BMC Med Res Methodol,2006

4. How reliable is peer review of scientific abstracts? Looking back at the 1991 Annual Meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine;Rubin;J Gen Intern Med,1993

5. A comparative study of scientific evaluation of abstracts submitted to the 1995 European Association for the Study of the Liver Copenhagen meeting;Vilstrup;Dan Med Bull,1998