Evaluation, Development, and Implementation of Potentially Better Practices in Neonatal Intensive Care Nutrition

Author:

Kuzma-O’Reilly Barbara1,Duenas Maria L.2,Greecher Coleen3,Kimberlin Lois3,Mujsce Dennis3,Miller Debra4,Walker Donna Jean5

Affiliation:

1. Mercy Children’s Hospital, Toledo, Ohio

2. St John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan

3. Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania

4. St. Joseph Health Centre, London, Ontario, Canada

5. Jackson Madison General Hospital, Jackson, Tennessee

Abstract

Objective. The desire for evidence-based clinical guidelines for nutritional support of the preterm infant has been identified. Published evidence has not yielded clear guidelines about the best method of delivery, substrate use, or appropriate outcome measure to evaluate nutrition support. In addition, reports on research of nutrition support often fail to give the most rudimentary process necessary to improve quality in various unit settings. Methods. The Vermont Oxford Network “Got Milk” focus group developed eight potentially better practices for nutrition support, implementation strategies for these practices, and a comprehensive appraisal process to measure nutrition outcome in preterm infants. Results. After implementation of the potentially better practices, all participating institutions showed earlier initiation of nutrition support, earlier attainment of adequate energy intakes, reduced delay in reaching full enteral feeds, more consistent nutrition support practice, decreased length of stay, cost savings, and improved growth at time of discharge. Conclusions. Development and implementation of evidence-based better nutrition support practices in neonates led to improved nutrient intake and growth with reduced length of stay and related costs. Consistent, comprehensive, multidisciplinary appraisal of practice is an integral component of improving nutrition outcomes in the neonatal population.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference48 articles.

1. Horbar JD, Plsek PE, Leahy K. NIC/Q 2000: establishing habits for improvement in neonatal intensive care units. Pediatrics.2003;111(suppl):e397–e410

2. Grossman RG. Quality improvement: an overview. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs.1998;12:42–50

3. Cremeux PY, Oulette P, Pilon C. Health care spending as determinants of health outcomes. Health Econ.1999;8:627–639

4. Carlson SJ, Ziegler EE. Nutrient intakes and growth of very low birth weight infants. J Perinatol.1998;18:252–258

5. Valentine CJ, Schanler RJ. Neonatal nutritionist intervention improves nutrition support and promotes cost containment in the management of LBW infants. JPEN.1993;(suppl 46):466

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3