Evaluation and Development of Potentially Better Practices to Prevent Neonatal Nosocomial Bacteremia

Author:

Kilbride Howard W.1,Powers Richard2,Wirtschafter David D.3,Sheehan Michael B.1,Charsha Dianne S.4,LaCorte Meena5,Finer Neil6,Goldmann Donald A.7

Affiliation:

1. Children’s Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, University of Missouri, Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri

2. Oakland’s Children’s Hospital, Oakland, California

3. Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Los Angeles, California

4. Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas

5. The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, New York

6. University of California, San Diego Medical Center, San Diego, California

7. Children’s Hospital, Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

Abstract

Objective. Six neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) that are members of the Vermont Oxford National Evidence-Based Quality Improvement Collaborative for Neonatology collaborated to reduce infection rates. There were 7 centers in the original focus group, but 1 center left the collaborative after 1 year. The objective of this study was to develop strategies to decrease nosocomial infection rates in NICUs. Methods. The process included a comprehensive literature review, internal practice analyses, benchmark studies, and development of practical experience through rapid-cycle changes, subsequent analysis, and feedback. This process led to 3 summary statements on potentially better practices in handwashing, approach to nosocomial sepsis evaluations, and central venous catheter management. Results. These statements provide a basis for an evidence-based approach to lowering neonatal intensive care unit nosocomial infection rates. Conclusions. The 2-year process also led to changes in the culture and habits of the institutions involved, which should in turn have long-term effects on other aspects of quality improvement.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3