Sleep Position of Low Birth Weight Infants

Author:

Vernacchio Louis12,Corwin Michael J.1,Lesko Samuel M.1,Vezina Richard M.1,Hunt Carl E.3,Hoffman Howard J.4,Willinger Marian5,Mitchell Allen A.1

Affiliation:

1. Slone Epidemiology Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts

2. Department of Pediatrics Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

3. Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Ohio, Toledo, Ohio

4. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

5. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

Abstract

Objectives. To describe sleep positions among low birth weight infants, variations in sleep position according to birth weight, and changes in sleep position over time. To analyze risk factors and influences associated with prone sleep. Design. Prospective cohort study. Setting. Massachusetts and Ohio, 1995–1998. Study Participants. Mothers of 907 low birth weight infants. Results. At 1, 3, and 6 months after hospital discharge, the prevalence of prone sleeping was 15.5%, 26.8%, and 28.3%, respectively. The corresponding rates for supine sleeping were 23.8%, 37.9%, and 50.2% and for side sleeping were 57.3%, 32.4%, and 20.6%. Very low birth weight (VLBW) infants (<1500 g) were most likely to be placed in the prone position. From 1995 through 1998, prone sleeping 1 month after hospital discharge declined among all low birth weight infants from 19.9% to 11.4%; among VLBW infants, the decline in prone sleeping was replaced almost entirely by an increase in side sleeping, whereas in larger low birth weight infants, it was replaced primarily by supine sleeping. Among mothers who placed their infants to sleep in nonprone positions, professional medical advice was cited most frequently as the most influential reason, whereas among mothers of prone-sleeping infants, the infant’s preference was cited most frequently. However, mothers of prone-sleeping VLBW infants also frequently cited the influence of medical professionals and nursery practices as most important in the choice of sleeping position. The factors most strongly associated with prone sleeping were single marital status (odds ratio [OR]: 3.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5–6.2), black race (OR: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.5–4.5), birth weight <1500 g (OR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.3–4.3), and multiparity (OR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.2–3.5). Conclusions. Prone sleep decreased among low birth weight infants from 1995 to 1998. However, VLBW infants, who are at very high risk for sudden infant death syndrome, are more likely to sleep prone than larger low birth weight infants.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3