Parent-Reported Clinical Utility of Pediatric Genomic Sequencing

Author:

Smith Hadley Stevens12,Ferket Bart S.34,Gelb Bruce D.4,Hindorff Lucia5,Ferar Kathleen D.6,Norton Mary E.7,Sahin-Hodoglugil Nuriye7,Slavotinek Anne7,Lich Kristen Hasmiller8,Berg Jonathan S.9,Russell Heidi V.1011

Affiliation:

1. aCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy

2. bPrecision Medicine Translational Research (PROMoTeR) Center, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts

3. cInstitute for Healthcare Delivery Science, Department of Population Health Science and Policy

4. dMindich Child Health and Development Institute, Departments of Pediatrics and Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York

5. eTraining, Diversity and Health Equity Office, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

6. fDivision of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

7. gUniversity of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California

8. hDepartments of Health Policy and Management

9. iGenetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

10. jDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

11. kDepartment of Management, Policy, and Community Health, UTHealth School of Public Health, Houston, Texas

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Genomic sequencing (GS) is increasingly used for diagnostic evaluation, yet follow-up care is not well understood. We assessed clinicians’ recommendations after GS, parent-reported follow-up, and actions parents initiated in response to learning their child’s GS results. METHODS We surveyed parents of children who received GS through the Clinical Sequencing Evidence Generating Research consortium ∼5 to 7 months after return of results. We compared the proportion of parents who reported discussing their child’s result with a clinician, clinicians’ recommendations, and parents’ follow-up actions by GS result type using χ2 tests. RESULTS A total of 1188 respondents completed survey measures on recommended medical actions (n = 1187) and/or parent-initiated actions (n = 913). Most parents who completed recommended medical actions questions (n = 833, 70.3%) reported having discussed their child’s GS results with clinicians. Clinicians made recommendations to change current care for patients with positive GS results (n = 79, 39.1%) more frequently than for those with inconclusive (n = 31, 12.4%) or negative results (n = 44, 11.9%; P < .001). Many parents discussed (n = 152 completed, n = 135 planned) implications of GS results for future pregnancies with a clinician. Aside from clinical recommendations, 13.0% (n = 119) of parents initiated changes to their child’s health or lifestyle. CONCLUSIONS In diverse pediatric clinical contexts, GS results can lead to recommendations for follow-up care, but they likely do not prompt large increases in the quantity of care received.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3