Trends in the Use and Discussion of Race in Pediatrics Articles Over 75 Years

Author:

Nama Nassr12,Panda Preeti3,Montez Kimberly4,Nafiu Olubukola O.5,First Lewis R.6,Kemper Alex R.7

Affiliation:

1. aDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children’s Hospital and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

2. bCenter for Clinical and Translational Research, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, Washington

3. cDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California

4. dDepartment of Pediatrics and Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

5. eAnesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio

6. fDepartment of Pediatrics, Robert Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont and University of Vermont Children’s Hospital, Burlington, Vermont

7. gDivision of Primary Care Pediatrics, Departments of Pediatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Race-based medicine, which falsely assumes that race is biological, is common in the published medical literature. We analyzed trends in the use of race in Pediatrics articles over a 75-year period. METHODS We analyzed a random sample of 50 original research articles published each decade in Pediatrics from 1948 to 2022. RESULTS Of 375 articles, 39% (n = 147) included race. Among articles, 85% (n = 116) used race only to describe study subjects, 7% (n = 9) described race as a social construct, and 11% (n = 15) described race as a biological construct. Only 7% (n = 10) of studies provided a reason for including race. Statements reflective of racial bias or discrimination were identified in 22% (n = 30) of the articles that mentioned race. Although statements concerning for explicit racial bias were uncommon, with none identified in the most recent decade, statements suggestive of implicit racial bias still occurred (22%, 5 of 23). Race was presented as a dichotomy, such as “white/nonwhite,” in 9% of studies (n = 12). Regarding currently nonrecommended terminology, the term “minorities” was used in 13% of studies (n = 18); 25% of studies used the term “others” (n = 34), and among these, 91% (n = 31 of 34) did not provide any definition, an occurrence that increased over time at a rate of 0.9%/year. CONCLUSIONS Although there has been improvement over the past 75 years in the reporting of race in published studies in Pediatrics, significant opportunities for further improvement remain.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3