Comparing AVPU and Glasgow Coma Scales Among Children Seen by Emergency Medical Services

Author:

Ramgopal Sriram123,Horvat Christopher M.4,Cash Rebecca E.5,Pelletier Jonathan H.67,Martin-Gill Christian8,Macy Michelle L.123

Affiliation:

1. aDivision of Emergency Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, and Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois

2. bMary Ann & J. Milburn Smith Child Health Outcomes, Research and Evaluation Center

3. cStanley Manne Children’s Research Institute, Chicago, Illinois

4. dDepartment of Critical Care, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

5. eDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston, Massachusetts

6. fDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Akron Children’s Hospital, Akron Ohio

7. gDepartment of Pediatrics, Northeast Ohio Medical University College of Medicine, Rootstown, Ohio

8. hEmergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Abstract

OBJECTIVES Consciousness assessment is an important component in the prehospital care of ill or injured children. Both the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and the Alert, Verbal, Pain, Unresponsive (AVPU) scale are used for this purpose. We sought to identify cut points for the GCS to correspond to the AVPU scale for pediatric emergency medical services (EMS) encounters. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis using the 2019–2022 National EMS Information System data set, including children (<18 years) with a GCS and AVPU score. We evaluated several approaches to develop cut points for the GCS within the AVPU scale and reported measures of performance. RESULTS Of 6 186 663 pediatric encounters, 4 311 598 with both GCS and AVPU documentation were included (median age was 10 years [interquartile range 3–15]; 50.9% boys). Lower AVPU scores correlated with life-sustaining procedures, including those for airway management, seizure, and cardiac arrest. Optimal GCS cut points obtained via a grid-based search were 14 to 15 for alert, 11 to 13 for verbal, 7 to 10 for pain, and 3 to 6 for unresponsive. Overall accuracy was 0.95, with kappa of 0.61. Intraclass F1 statistics were lower for verbal (0.37) and pain (0.50) categories compared with alert (0.98) and unresponsive (0.78). CONCLUSIONS We developed a cross-walking between the AVPU and GCS scales. Overall performance was high, though performance within the verbal and pain categories was lower. These findings can be useful to enhance clinician handovers and to aid in the development of EMS-based prediction models.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3