Disparities in Vision Screening in Primary Care for Young Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder

Author:

Hoover Kimberly1,Di Guglielmo Matthew D.12,Perry Brittany12

Affiliation:

1. aSidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

2. bDivision of General Academic Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Nemours Children’s Health, Delaware

Abstract

OBJECTIVES To determine the rate of vision screening among children with and without autism spectrum disorder (ASD), the rate of photoscreening compared with visual acuity screening, and the effect of demographic factors on vision screening for children with ASD. METHODS Data from well visits for 3- to 5-year-olds between January 2016 and December 2019 were collected via PEDSnet. Billing codes for vision screening were a proxy for the completion of vision screening. χ2 analysis examined the relationship of age, sex, race, ethnicity, region, and socioeconomic status to vision screening rate and rate of photoscreening versus visual acuity screening. Multivariate logistic regression assessed factors that impacted the odds of vision screening. RESULTS We analyzed 63 829 well-child visits. Children with ASD were less likely to have a vision screening (36.5%) compared with children without ASD (59.9%). The lowest rates of screening occurred during the 3-year visit. Of those with ASD, Black children had a lower screening rate (27.6%) than white (39.7%) and other/multiracial children (39.8%). The use of photoscreening was higher in Hispanic children, increasing the overall rate of vision screening greater than non-Hispanic children. Practice region influenced the rates of vision screening for children with ASD because of more photoscreening. CONCLUSIONS Children with ASD are less likely to receive vision screening at well visits compared with typically developing children. This disparity was greatest among younger children and Black children. One practice region used more photoscreening and had higher rates of screening. Photoscreening is a useful tool to decrease disparity, especially among high-risk patient groups.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3