Interventions in the Home and Community for Medically Complex Children: A Systematic Review

Author:

Watkinson Michelle D.1,Ehlenbach Mary2,Chung Paul J.34,Kelly Michelle2,Werner Nicole5,Jolliff Anna6,Katz Barbara7,Marleau Heidi8,Nacht Carrie L.9,Warner Gemma2,Coller Ryan J.2

Affiliation:

1. aDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

2. bDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin

3. cDepartment of Health Systems Science, Kaiser Permanente School of Medicine, Pasadena, California

4. dDepartments of Pediatrics and Health Policy and Management, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California

5. iIndiana University School of Public Health, Bloomington, Indiana

6. eIndustrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin

7. fFamily Voices of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin

8. gEbling Library for the Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin System, Madison, Wisconsin

9. hSan Diego State University School of Public Health, San Diego, California

Abstract

CONTEXT Most care occurs in home and community settings; however, the best approaches to improve CMC health are poorly understood. OBJECTIVE We sought to summarize evidence from interventions in the home and community to improve health for children with medical complexity (CMC) using comprehensive conceptions of CMC health. DATA SOURCES PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. STUDY SELECTION Included studies evaluated interventions for CMC caregivers in home or community settings and evaluated at least 1 outcome in 10 domains of CMC health. DATA EXTRACTION Data were extracted on participant characteristics, intervention activities, and outcomes. Interventions were categorized thematically into strategies, with results summarized by effects on outcomes within each health domain. RESULTS The 25 included interventions used 5 strategies: intensive caregiver education (n = 18), support groups (n = 3), crisis simulation (n = 2), mobile health tracking (n = 1), and general education (n = 1). Substantial variation existed in the extent to which any outcome domain was studied (range 0–22 studies per domain). Interventions addressing 4 domains showed consistent improvement: support group and mobile health tracking improved long-term child and caregiver self-sufficiency; mobile health tracking improved family-centered care; intensive caregiver education and support groups improved community system supports. Three domains (basic needs, inclusive education, patient-centered medical home) were not studied. LIMITATIONS Risk of bias was moderate due primarily to limited controlled experimental designs and heterogeneous population and outcome definitions. CONCLUSIONS Interventions that improve CMC health exist; however, current studies focus on limited segments of the 10 domains framework. Consensus outcome measures for CMC health are needed.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3