Home Care for Bronchiolitis: A Systematic Review

Author:

Lawrence Joanna1234,Walpola Ramesh4,Boyce Suzanne L.156,Bryant Penelope A.1376,Sharma Anurag4,Hiscock Harriet23

Affiliation:

1. aHospital in the Home

2. bHealth Services Research Unit

3. cDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

4. dSchool of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

5. eDepartment of General Paediatrics

6. gClinical Paediatrics Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia

7. fInfectious Disease Unit, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia

Abstract

CONTEXT Bronchiolitis is the leading cause of pediatric hospital admissions. Hospital-at-Home (HAH) delivers hospital-level care at home, relieving pressure on the hospital system. OBJECTIVES We aimed to review the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of HAH for bronchiolitis, and assess the cost-impact to hospitals and society. DATA SOURCES Ovid Medline, Embase, Pubmed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Web of Science. STUDY SELECTION Studies (randomized control trials, retrospective audits, prospective observational trials) of infants with bronchiolitis receiving HAH (oxygen, nasogastric feeding, remote monitoring). Studies were limited to English language since 2000. DATA EXTRACTION We reviewed all studies in duplicate for inclusion, data extraction, and risk of bias. RESULTS Ten studies met inclusion criteria, all for home oxygen therapy (HOT). One abstract on nasogastric feeding did not meet full inclusion criteria. No studies on remote monitoring were found. HOT appears feasible in terms of uptake (70%–82%) and successful completion, both at altitude and sea-level. Caregiver acceptability was reported in 2 qualitative studies. There were 7 reported adverse events (0.6%) with 0 mortality in 1257 patients. Cost studies showed evidence of savings, although included costs to hospitals only. LIMITATIONS Small number of studies with heterogenous study design and quality. No adequately powered randomized control studies. CONCLUSIONS Evidence exists to support HOT as feasible, acceptable, and safe. Evidence of cost-effectiveness remains limited. Further research is needed to understand the relevant impact of HAH versus alternative interventions to reduce oxygen prescribing. Other models of care looking at nasogastric feeding support and remote monitoring should be explored.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3