How Physicians Discuss Uncertainty With Parents in Intensive Care Units

Author:

Prins Sanne1,Linn Annemiek J.2,van Kaam Anton H.L.C.3,van de Loo Moniek3,van Woensel Job B.M.4,van Heerde Marc4,Dijk Peter H.5,Kneyber Martin C.J.6,de Hoog Matthijs7,Simons Sinno H.P.8,Akkermans Aranka A.9,Smets Ellen M.A.9,Hillen Marij A.9,de Vos Mirjam A.1

Affiliation:

1. aDepartment of Pediatrics

2. bAmsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

3. cDivisions of Neonatology

4. dPediatric Intensive Care, Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

5. eDepartment of Pediatrics, Divisions of Neonatology

6. fPediatric Critical Care Medicine, Beatrix Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands

7. gDepartment of Pediatrics, Divisions of Pediatric Intensive Care

8. hNeonatology, Sophia Children’s Hospital, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

9. iDepartment of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Physicians and parents of critically ill neonates and children receiving intensive care have to make decisions on the child’s behalf. Throughout the child’s illness and treatment trajectory, adequately discussing uncertainties with parents is pivotal because this enhances the quality of the decision-making process and may positively affect the child’s and parents’ well-being. We investigated how physicians discuss uncertainty with parents and how this discussion evolves over time during the trajectory. METHODS We asked physicians working in the NICU and PICU of 3 university medical centers to audio record their conversations with parents of critically ill children from the moment doubts arose whether treatment was in the child’s best interests. We qualitatively coded and analyzed the anonymized transcripts, thereby using the software tool MAXQDA 2020. RESULTS Physicians were found to adapt the way they discussed uncertainty with parents to the specific phase of the child’s illness and treatment trajectory. When treatment options were still available, physicians primarily focused on uncertainty related to diagnostic procedures, treatment options, and associated risks and effects. Particularly when the child’s death was imminent, physicians had less “scientific” guidance to offer. They eliminated most uncertainty and primarily addressed practical uncertainties regarding the child’s dying process to offer parents guidance. CONCLUSIONS Our insights may increase physicians’ awareness and enhance their skills in discussing uncertainties with parents tailored to the phase of the child’s illness and treatment trajectory and to parental needs in each specific phase.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3