Affiliation:
1. Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
2. Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
3. Department of Regulatory & Quality Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
Abstract
Few medical devices are designed and marketed specifically for children. Instead, adult devices are often repurposed and used off-label in pediatrics. The innovation gap between pediatric and adult devices is complex and multifactorial. This review aims to summarize the medical device landscape, describe barriers to pediatric device development, and provide an update on current strategies to help overcome these limitations. Medical devices are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration. They are registered, cleared, or approved on the basis of a 3-tier risk classification system and a differentiated set of regulatory pathways. This includes some for products that receive special designations on the basis of specific aspects that warrant more rapid review and approval. Pediatric devices number only one-quarter of those developed for adults for multiple reasons. Clinically, innovators must adjust their products to address the smaller sizes, growth, and longer duration of use in children. Smaller sample sizes and population heterogeneity also challenge the ability to obtain sufficient safety data for regulatory submissions. Financial concerns stem from lower pediatric reimbursement rates coupled with a lack of nationally standardized coverage. There are a number of promising initiatives, including the Pediatric Device Consortia Program, Early Feasibility Studies, and the new System of Hospitals for Innovation in Pediatrics – Medical Devices. However, the gap will likely not be narrowed without broad cooperation across stakeholders from industry, academia, patient advocacy groups, health care providers, investors, payors, regulators, and Congress.
Publisher
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
Subject
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference78 articles.
1. FDA medical device approval: things you didn’t learn in medical school or residency;Buch;Am J Orthop,2007
2. Pediatric interventional cardiology in the United States is dependent on the off-label use of medical devices;Sutherell;Congenit Heart Dis,2010
3. The US Food and Drug Administration, The Center for Devices and Radiological Health
. Device classification panels. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/medical- devices/classify-your-medical-device/device-classification-panels. Accessed May 10, 2021
4. The US Food and Drug Administration
. CFR—Code of federal regulations title 21. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/cfrsearch.cfm?fr=3.2. Accessed May 10, 2021
5. The US Food and Drug Administration
. Software as a medical device (SaMD): key definitions. Available at: https://www.imdrf.org/sites/default/files/docs/imdrf/final/technical/imdrf-tech-131209-samd key-definitions-140901.pdf. Accessed July 9, 2021.
Cited by
24 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献