Tactile Stimulation in Newborn Infants With Inadequate Respiration at Birth: A Systematic Review

Author:

Guinsburg Ruth1,de Almeida Maria Fernanda B.1,Finan Emer2,Perlman Jeffrey M.3,Wyllie Jonathan4,Liley Helen G.5,Wyckoff Myra H.6,Isayama Tetsuya7

Affiliation:

1. Division of Neonatal Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

2. Department of Paediatrics, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

3. Weill Cornell Medicine and New York-Presbyterian Komansky Children’s Hospital, New York, New York

4. Department of Paediatrics and Neonatology, James Cook University Hospital, South Tees National Health Services Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom

5. Mater Research Institute and Mater Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

6. Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas

7. Division of Neonatology, Center for Maternal-Fetal Neonatal and Reproductive Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan

Abstract

CONTEXT For many years the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation has recommended the use of tactile stimulation for initial management of infants born with inadequate respiratory effort at birth without systematically examining its effectiveness. OBJECTIVE Systematic review to compare the effectiveness of tactile stimulation with routine handling in newly born term and preterm infants. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, along with clinical trial registries. STUDY SELECTION Randomized and non-randomized studies were included based on predetermined criteria. DATA EXTRACTION Data were extracted independently by authors. Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) was used to assess risk of bias in non-randomized studies. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) was used to assess the certainty of evidence. RESULTS Among 2455 unique articles identified, 2 observational studies were eligible and qualitatively summarized. Because one of the studies was at critical risk of bias, only the other study including 243 preterm infants on continuous positive airway pressure with clinical indications for tactile stimulation was analyzed. It showed a reduction in tracheal intubation in infants receiving tactile stimulation compared with no tactile stimulation (12 of 164 vs 14 of 79, risk ratio of 0.41 [95% confidence interval 0.20 to 0.85]); however, the certainty of evidence was very low. LIMITATIONS The available data were limited and only from observational studies. CONCLUSIONS A potential benefit of tactile stimulation was identified but was limited by the very low certainty of evidence. More research is suggested to evaluate the effectiveness as well as the optimal type and duration of tactile stimulation.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference35 articles.

1. United Nations Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation . Levels & trends in child mortality: report 2020, estimates developed by the United Nations inter-agency group for child mortality estimation. Available at: https://www.unicef.org/media/79371/file/UN-IGME-child-mortality-report-2020.pdf.pdf Accessed May 14, 2021

2. Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000-15: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the sustainable development goals;Liu;Lancet,2016

3. Early initiation of basic resuscitation interventions including face mask ventilation may reduce birth asphyxia related mortality in low-income countries: a prospective descriptive observational study;Ersdal;Resuscitation,2012

4. Stimulating and maintaining spontaneous breathing during transition of preterm infants;Dekker;Pediatr Res,2021

5. Reflexes that impact spontaneous breathing of preterm infants at birth: a narrative review;Kuypers;Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3