Meta-analysis of the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised/Follow-up for Screening

Author:

Aishworiya Ramkumar123,Ma Van Kim14,Stewart Susan5,Hagerman Randi14,Feldman Heidi M.6

Affiliation:

1. aMedical Investigation of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (MIND) Institute

2. bKhoo Teck Puat-National University Children’s Medical Institute, National University Health System, Singapore

3. cDepartment of Pediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore

4. dDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine

5. eDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, California

6. fDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California

Abstract

CONTEXT The Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised with Follow-up (M-CHAT-R/F) is used worldwide to screen for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). OBJECTIVE To calculate psychometric properties of the M-CHAT-R/F for subsequent diagnosis of ASD. DATA SOURCES Systematic searches of Medline, Embase, SCOPUS, and Trip Pro databases from January 2014 to November 2021. STUDY SELECTION Studies were included if they (1) used the M-CHAT-R/F (2) applied standard scoring protocol, (3) used a diagnostic assessment for ASD, and (4) reported at least 1 psychometric property of the M-CHAT-R/F. DATA EXTRACTION Two independent reviewers completed screening, full-text review, data extraction, and quality assessment, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. A random-effects model was used to derive pooled estimates and assess for between-study heterogeneity. RESULTS Of 667 studies identified, 15 with 18 distinct samples from 10 countries (49 841 children) were used in the meta-analysis. Pooled positive predictive value (PPV), was 57.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 48.6–66.8, τ2 = 0.031). PPV was higher among high-risk (75.6% [95% CI 66.0–85.2]) than low-risk samples (51.2% [95% CI 43.0–59.5]). Pooled negative predictive value was 72.5% (95% CI 62.5–82.4 τ2 = 0.031), sensitivity was 82.6% (95% CI 76.2–88.9) and specificity 45.7% (95% CI 25.0–66.4). LIMITATIONS Negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated based on small sample sizes because of limited or no evaluation of screen-negative children. CONCLUSIONS These results support use of the M-CHAT-R/F as a screening tool for ASD. Caregiver counseling regarding likelihood of an ASD diagnosis after positive screen should acknowledge the moderate PPV.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3