Affiliation:
1. From the Institute for Health Policy and the
2. Center for Child and Adolescent Health Policy of Massachusetts General Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and the
3. Agency for Health Care Research and Quality, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Abstract
Objective.
Improving the quality of health care is a national priority. Nonetheless, no systematic effort has assessed the status of quality improvement (QI) initiatives for children or reviewed past research in child health care QI. This assessment is necessary to establish priorities for QI programs and research.
Methods.
To assess the status of QI initiatives and research, we reviewed the literature and interviewed experts experienced in QI for child health services. We defined QI as activities intended to close the gap between desired processes and outcomes of care and what is actually delivered. We classified reports published between 1985 and 1997 by publication characteristics, study design, clinical problem addressed, site of intervention, the QI method(s) used, and explicit association with a continuous quality improvement program.
Results.
We reviewed 68 reports meeting our definition of QI. More than half (48) were published after 1994. The reviewed reports included controlled evaluations in 36% of all identified interventions, and 3% of the reports were associated with continuous quality improvement. QI methods demonstrating some effectiveness included reminder systems for office-based preventive services and inpatient pathways for complex care. Reportedly successful QI initiatives more commonly described improvement in administrative measures such as rate of hospitalization or length of stay rather than functional status or quality of life. Interviews found that barriers to QI for children were similar to those for adults, but were compounded by difficulties in measuring child health outcomes, limited resources among public organizations and small provider groups, and relative lack of competition for pediatric tertiary care providers. Research and dissemination of QI for children were seen as less well developed than for adults.
Conclusions.
Attempts to improve the quality of child health services have been increasing, and the evidence we reviewed suggests that it is possible to improve the quality of care for children. Nonetheless, numerous gaps remain in the understanding of QI for children, and widespread improvement in the quality of health services for children faces significant barriers.
Publisher
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
Subject
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference109 articles.
1. The urgent need to improve health care quality. Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality.;Chassin;JAMA.,1998
2. Overview of issues in improving quality of care for children.;McGlynn;Health Serv Res.,1998
3. Improving the quality of healthcare for children: implementing the results of the AHSR research agenda conference.;Halfon;Health Serv Res.,1998
4. Child health services research: challenges and opportunities.;Forrest;JAMA.,1997
Cited by
61 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献