Bacteremia, Central Catheters, and Neonates: When to Pull the Line

Author:

Benjamin Daniel K.12,Miller William2,Garges Harmony1,Benjamin Daniel K.3,McKinney Ross E.1,Cotton Michael1,Fisher Randall G.4,Alexander Kenneth A.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina;

2. Department of Epidemiology, Schools of Medicine and Public Heath, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;

3. Department of Economics, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina; and

4. Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters, Norfolk, Virginia.

Abstract

Objectives. Physicians who treat neonates who become bacteremic while dependent on central venous catheters face a serious and common dilemma. We sought 1) to evaluate the relationship between central venous catheter removal and outcome in bacteremic neonates, 2) to determine species of bacteria that are associated with an increased risk of infectious complications if the central catheter is not removed promptly, and 3) to provide evidence-based recommendations for central catheter management. Method. A retrospective cohort study of all neonates who had central venous access and developed bacteremia between July 1, 1995, and July 31, 1999, was conducted in the Duke University neonatal intensive care unit. Results. The outcome for patients in whom the central catheter was not removed within 24 hours of organism identification was significantly worse (odds ratio = 9.8) than it was for those whose catheters were removed promptly. For patients who were infected withStaphylococcus aureus or with nonenteric Gram-negative rods, delayed removal of the central catheter was associated with complicated bacteremia. Catheter sterilization was attempted in 27 neonates who were infected with enteric Gram-negative rods; only 10 of these infants retained their catheters without infection-related complications. Infants who had 4 consecutive blood cultures that were positive for coagulase-negative staphylococcus (CoNS) were at significantly increased risk for end-organ damage and death, compared with infants who had 3 or fewer positive blood culture for CoNS (odds ratio = 29.58). Conclusions. Bacteremic infants experienced fewer infection-related complications when the central catheter was removed promptly. One positive blood culture for Saureus or a Gram-negative rod warrants central line removal in a neonate. Clinicians who are faced with a neonate who has 1 positive culture for CoNS may attempt medical management without central catheter removal, but documentation of subsequent negative blood cultures is crucial. Once a neonate has 3 positive blood cultures for CoNS, the central catheter should be removed.central line, neonate, bacteremia, bacteria, umbilical catheter, Broviac, percutaneous.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference9 articles.

1. Infectious complications of indwelling vascular catheters.;Raad;Clin Infect Dis,1992

2. Outcome of treatment of candidemia in children whose central catheters were removed or retained.;Eppes;Pediatr Infect Dis J,1989

3. Percutaneous central venous catheter use in the very low birth weight neonate.;Cairns;Eur J Pediatr,1995

4. When to suspect fungal infection in neonates: a clinical comparison of Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosisfungemia with coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteremia.;Benjamin;Pediatrics.,2000

5. Septicemia due to Xanthomonas species and non-aeruginosa pseudomonas species: increasing incidence of catheter-related infections.;Elting;Medicine,1990

Cited by 155 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Neonatal bacteremia and sepsis;Remington and Klein's Infectious Diseases of the Fetus and Newborn Infant;2025

2. Staphylococcal infections;Remington and Klein's Infectious Diseases of the Fetus and Newborn Infant;2025

3. Staphylococcus capitis Central-Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Single-Center, Four-Year Experience in Central-Line Management during Sepsis Treatment;Pathogens;2024-03-07

4. Late-Onset Sepsis;Principles of Neonatology;2024

5. Healthcare-Associated Infections;Avery's Diseases of the Newborn;2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3